2015 Lincoln MKC First Drive


Cars.com's team of editors at the 2013 Los Angeles Auto Show were convinced Lincoln's compact luxury SUV, the MKC, had the right attitude to jump into the extremely competitive segment with a full head of steam; we unanimously named it a "Winner" in our auto show postmortem.

2013 L.A. Auto Show: Luxury Car Winners and Losers

Fast-forward a few months and I'm driving preproduction versions of the MKC in the Santa Barbara, Calif., area. Lincoln chose a peculiar selection of pavement for the introductory drive, consisting of high-speed canyon roads with countless tight turns, dips and elevation changes. It's the kind of road motorcycles and sports cars call home, but not small SUVs. Did I mention this is a Lincoln? A brand that doesn't have the most sporting reputation.

My chariot for most of the test was a loaded MKC with the optional and more-powerful turbocharged 285-horsepower, 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine, which comes standard with all-wheel drive. Perhaps the biggest surprise from this first romp in the MKC is that it's not at all out of place being ferociously driven through winding California roads.


The MKC's surprising agility is something almost all compact luxury SUVs promise; some deliver more than others. The competitive set includes the Acura RDX, BMW X1/X3, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Audi Q5. Few MKC owners will ever take their car on these canyon roads, but shoppers will be glad to know the MKC's sporty promises are honored. The well-balanced MKC has significantly more cornering grip and handling confidence than you'd expect from a Lincoln SUV.

Best of all, ride quality on everyday roads is still luxury-like even with the MKC's surprising dynamics. All-wheel-drive models use Lincoln's continuously controlled dampening suspension to adjust shock firmness on the fly, and it works to a big extent. The SUV hunkers down in Sport mode and reduces body motion to almost nil compared to the comfy, isolated default mode.


Luxury-like also describes the noise levels in various types of driving. Active noise cancellation and acoustic glass are a few ways Lincoln suppresses unwanted noises. There's a slight whistle of wind noise at highway speeds. No worries, as the excellent and optional THX sound system can drown that out with ease.

Under the hood is equally quiet with both the more powerful engine I spent the most time driving, and the standard 240-hp, turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder I took for a brief spin on different roads. The 2.3-liter is a unique engine not offered on the Ford Escape from which the MKC is derived, and is similar to the four-cylinder soon to be under the hood of the 2015 Ford Mustang. Power from the 2.3-liter is good; however, I wouldn't call it particularly fun or a huge upgrade considering the 2.0-liter offers a similar punch despite being down 45 hp. Lincoln's power ratings are measured using premium fuel, and regular can be used but won't return the same power.

The 2.3-liter is currently offered in only the two higher trim levels, which puts its premium at over $4,000 versus the 2.0 all-wheel drive. It also has the lowest fuel economy of the bunch with 18/26/21 mpg city/highway/combined ratings and only comes with all-wheel drive. A front-wheel-drive 2.0-liter is rated at 20/29/23 mpg and with all-wheel drive is 19/26/22 mpg.


Lincoln's design department should get a high-five for how well the MKC looks going down the road. Tight proportions, oozing style and a mean, aggressive stance are traits that breathe fresh air into the Lincoln brand. There's little indication the MKC is based off Ford's Escape platform — the MKC is sleeker and wider, and the contemporary exterior and interior are just as impressive now as they were on the auto show floor. It does all this without much sacrifice to interior room. At 6 feet tall, I sat comfortably in the backseat despite a sloping roofline that usually cuts into headroom.

So far, you've seen "optional" and "available" used frequently above, with good reason. Loaded with optional equipment like Bridge of Weir leather seating, 19-inch wheels, panoramic roof, navigation, blind spot warning, a Technology Package with adaptive cruise control and active park assist, power tilt/telescoping steering wheel, THX stereo and a lot more, the MKC I tested was a pricey $50,405 — the entry-level model starts at $33,995 (prices include destination).


On the inside, Lincoln carries over the push-button gear selector from the MKZ. It's there to free up space on the center console, and of course to be unique. In terms of usability difference compared to a traditional gear selector, there's nothing groundbreaking with how the freed-up console space is used. There's a small cubby with two USB ports and two cupholders — spaces easily found in other luxury SUVs that use a console shifter. I prefer the tactile feel of a traditional shifter compared to this button layout.

Lincoln sold roughly 600 MKCs so far in its first month on sale. Cars.com's national inventory is quickly populating with the MKC and currently shows pricing favoring the $40,000-$45,000 spectrum. Lincoln offers a lot of flexibility with pricing and individual options, so it's easy to customize to a price range. For $40,000-$45,000, the MKC should be a serious consideration for compact luxury SUV shoppers.



Max price on the RDX with all the options is just a little over $40k. This seems kind of expensive when optioned up to $50k.



True. But the Acura "ugly tax" is pretty steep.


The Acura RDX is a much better vehicle but the world is filled with dumb people so Lincoln will surely find some customers.



Don't forget ignorant, too.

Rumor has it GM wants it's Pontiac grill back.


Carey, that's a well thought out post with specificity to back up your statement (insert sarcasm here).

George C

So, is '15 or '16 Lincoln's last?


Everyone should reserve judgment until there is a proper comparison test. And how is the RDX a much better vehicle? The current one doesn't compare well to the previous model.


jay, the new RDX is selling at about double the rate of the older one. It's a much better vehicle in MPG, ride, smooth V6 and looks a lot better now that the beak has been substantially muted. The boy racer version just didn't fly very well as it was small inside, rough riding, had turbo lag and got terrible MPG for such a small CUV. The new one is much more popular and sales are proving it.

HooHooCakes McGee

Lance, you don't seem to realize that, fully optioned, this thing has a boatload of luxury class features that simply can't be had on the RDX: lane departure prevention, adaptive cruise, auto-braking, park assist, cooled seats, blind spot monitoring....


You're right. There is a lot of extra safety equipment but it costs a ton ---10 grand. I haven't tried but I wonder what the cost comparison would be to a loaded RDX with the same equipment?

I never said anything bad about the MKC, just that to be competitive I think it should be priced lower. It will be interesting to see what the new Lexus NX will priced like. If you can get the NX for the same MSRP as the MKC, the Lexus brand reputation will win out easily.


I just drove an MKC and an RDX back to back. Anyone sitting in the RDX after sitting in the MKC is going to be completely turned off by the outdated interior and lack of basic lux amenities in the RDX. The RDX is better compared to the Escape Titanium.


Completely agree Mark, test drove both, MKC is a better ride and more luxurious; the RDX has lots of cheap interior plastics, an annoying VCM vibration on the powertrain when turning off 1, 2 or more cylinders to save gas and there is no current fix for that. Plus, the RDX has a clunky rear suspension, unsettled ride, no luxury options (BLIS, Panoramic, adaptive cruise, auto dimming mirrors, lane departure, passenger seat height adj, etc) and the road noise is still quite intrusive (typical of Honda), Lincoln is much quieter despite being a 4 cylinder. The RDX should compete with fully loaded versions of more mainstream brands (Highlander, Escape Titanium, Murano, GMC and Tiguan). The lack of options puts it in a lower league than BMW, Mercedes, Audi, Lexus and Land Rover; Lincoln may be just in between.


LOL at comparing this to an RDX. I've driven both. The level of interior refinement and available options in the Lincoln absolutely crushes the RDX.

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App