Do You Need an All-Wheel Drive Minivan?


The main mission of a minivan is to haul people, more so than even the more popular SUVs that account for more than 30 percent of new-vehicle sales.

Yet, whereas more than half of SUVs are equipped with all- or four-wheel drive, Toyota stands alone among minivan manufacturers in offering all-wheel drive, which is installed on about 17 percent of Siennas sold in the U.S. In contrast, about 60 percent of Toyota Highlander SUVs are equipped with all-wheel drive.

2014 Toyota Sienna Review

That percentage apparently is enough to satisfy the bean counters at Toyota, which has the all-wheel-drive minivan niche all to itself; the Sienna's main rivals seem to be in no hurry to try to crash that party.

Todd Breneiser, product planning director for the Chrysler Group, said Chrysler's minivan owners aren't clamoring for all-wheel drive. Chrysler offered all-wheel drive on its minivans starting in 1991 but dropped it in 2004 because the rear drive shafts interfered with the then-new Stow 'n Go seats that fold into the floor.

"There's a vocal minority that would really like to have the all-wheel drive, and that's in the same parts of the country where we see the high take rates for other all-wheel-drive vehicles, but for the general population, I wouldn't say it's in high demand," Breneiser said in a telephone interview.

"Every year we go out and we do research about what customers like about the vehicle, what they don't like. Our customers continue to return to us, and we don't have all-wheel drive," he added.

With front-wheel drive, minivans are well equipped to handle at least moderate amounts of snow, Breneiser said, and winter tires can improve traction, so all-wheel drive isn't a must for most drivers. Executive Editor Joe Wiesenfelder agrees that all-wheel drive, though good to have, may not be necessary.


"My way of thinking for Chicago has long been that it's usually unnecessary, especially versus front-wheel drive, but that's because we have decent snow removal and practically no hills. I'm more likely to say go for all-wheel drive to people who have hills or inadequate snow removal," Wiesenfelder said, adding, "Here in Chicago it's the difference between getting around at all in one or two storms a year, and getting around a bit easier the rest of the season."

"I tested a 2014 Sienna with all-wheel drive during some of this year's worst weather," Managing Editor David Thomas said. "I was impressed by how much traction I was getting from a standing stop on ice- and snow-packed roads. The Sienna just didn't slip. I drove a Dodge Grand Caravan in similar weather weeks before and it got me home, but it didn't have that grip."

Wiesenfelder noted that all-wheel-drive Siennas come with run-flat tires, which are more expensive to replace than conventional tires, and no spare tire.

In addition, all-wheel-drive versions of the Sienna lose the center seat in the second row and the second-row tip feature (though the seats still slide), and have a seven-passenger capacity. Cargo capacity is unchanged on all-wheel-drive models.

Chrysler created the modern minivan in 1984 and, as it marks its 30th year of minivan production, it continues to lead the industry in sales by a wide margin.

Combined sales of the Chrysler Town & Country and Dodge Grand Caravan were 246,307 in 2013. Among other major players, Honda sold 128,987 Odysseys (making it the top-selling individual model), and Toyota sold 121,117 Siennas.

Honda spokesman Chris Martin said dealers in snowy sections of the country continue to ask for an all-wheel-drive minivan, but he noted that the Odyssey outsells the Sienna without it.

With Honda's SUVs, the Pilot and CR-V, all-wheel drive is an essential ingredient, accounting for about 65 percent of the mix. With the Odyssey, Honda doesn't want to mess with success.

"When you add AWD to a model, it affects packaging and fuel efficiency, two of the Odyssey's great strengths versus the competition," Martin said in an email message. Automakers can change their minds, but Chrysler's Breneiser didn't sound like someone who is losing sleep over the current situation.

"There are customers who do want it, and we continue to monitor that, but for the vast majority of minivan buyers across all manufacturers, that's not the loudest voice," he said.



See, an AWD Odyssey option would potentially seal the deal for me (Although not if it's got those $$$ run-flat tires that the Sienna has) It would depend on the price and if it forced other options.

I live in southern CT, where I took my Outback (with Blizzaks) to work this morning, thanks to the 6" of snow we got overnight. I'd rather give up AWD than the winter tires if I had to choose only one... but I'd prefer to have both.(and I will continue to put winter tires on all my vehicles, regardless of drive configuration, because it's better for stopping/turning/overall control)

I do, however, like sliding doors and an easy step-in height of a minivan. Kid-friendly is a big plus, as our family is growing. And sliding doors help every single day with parking spaces and our garage.

CT has plenty of hills and steep driveways where AWD helps a lot, but it's not quite enough for me to rush out and buy an SUV, espeically when they have many other compromises. And if the Odyssey doesn't offer AWD convenience, I might as well get something a tad smaller and MUCH less expensive, like a Mazda5. (The most expensive Mazda5 costs $2k less than the cheapest Odyssey...) Sure it's a good deal smaller, but there's very little compromise.

The big shame, though is if you make a side-by-side list of the Honda Pilot and the Honda Odyssey, you start to wonder why the Odyssey can't manage to have AWD. The two vehicles have the same engines, similar weight, and similar fuel economy (Pilot is 1 worse combined MPG, 3 worse on the highway by EPA reckoning)

But the Odyssey has WAY more cargo an seat space. In fact, the Odyssey nearly TWICE the interior volume behind the middle row as the Pilot. Sure, the Oddy is a foot longer outside, and has a 9" longer wheelbase than the Pilot, but the point is that the only thing the Pilot offers better than the Odyssey is AWD and 1000 lbs more towing capacity. (And given that most Pilots I see don't even have a tow hitch, I don't think the towing issue is a big deal)

I see a LOT of Pilots serving family duty around town, and I have to seriously wonder - how many Pilot drivers would have preferred a hypothetical AWD Odyssey instead? Does Honda ask Pilot buyers that question?

No, I don't *need* an AWD minivan. But I also didn't ask for one of the legions of short-wheelbase, jacked-up mini-SUVs that everyone seems to love, either.

But I guess I'm a practical engineer who wants to pick and choose car features, and isn't hung up on vehicle image.


agree with CTMechE.

I got the Sienna for its AWD availability, and I refuse to get a less practical SUV/crossover. I am also glad I can drive in snowy weather (usually before plows get to the roads) with AWD PLUS winter tires.

BTW the Sienna AWD also cannot be had with the power-folding 3rd row. Manual is actually much faster to use.


Oh, and the run-flats that come standard on the Sienna AWD models are TERRIBLE on ice when it comes to stopping distance. I would avoid them -- get a good set of tires and a can of Fix-a-flat.

I *NEED* a minivan with AWD with winter tires because I live in NH, have to often get out before the plows do, and have 3 kids in carseats. I also can't stand SUVs because of what they represent. So yeah, I am one of the few people who actually need these ugly things.


"I also can't stand SUVs because of what they represent." ...ok, what do they represent? Not sure I get that statement. Your Sienna gets slightly better mileage than my Land Rover LR2, and with the seats folded flat, Ican cayy loads of "stuff"


I too have a minivan and have been trying to decide whether to get another or to get an SUV for the AWD option. I have children and do lots of running around so the van is great however living in MA and spending so such time in NH AWD would be much better. I have never understood way they don't have more family and budget friendly AWD options. Us mom and dads who have multiple children , animals and household shopping lists all know the struggles of having to choose between space and road worthiness in New England


I also want more AWD van choices. I have purchased 2 of them brand new, and may buy a Sienna AWD in the future. My first was a'94 Dodge Grand Caravan AWD. And the one I'm still driving is the '04 Dodge Grand Caravan AWD. Honda should offer one. And Chrysler-Dodge should offer one. Yes, they would have to lose the "S & G folding seats" to make room under the floor, for the AWD system. But, they would sell.


To add "why" AWD is important to me. I drive up, over and through snow covered highways and freeways all winter, every year. Also, ski area parking lots that are usually flat but covered in melting ice and slush and deep ruts. Many people have to "chain-up" just to get out of the parking lot, but you don't have to do that with AWD. I want a van more than an SUV, because of ALL the practical cargo room, the low floor, the big sliding doors, better mpg, and easier parking than a Suburban, etc. When I carry 4-7 people I'll put the seats back in. When I want a hard and flat floor (and a lighter van that gets better mpg and performance) I'll take the seats out. Cars brands market the safety and all-road worthy-ness of AWD to sell cars. Why are vans any different? If Chrysler and Honda advertise these qualities for vans, (like they do for AWD cars and SUV's) they would sell lots of AWD vans.


I like to trailer a boat and the front wheel drive on the vans is no good on the wet ramps. I need the power in the rear or awl. The engines are big enough but the design does not work.



What do SUV's represent?

Mom - don't call me "soccermom"!

I had a Sienna a few years' ago and found it was much more spacious and comfortable than the Odyssey even though the Odyssey's interior does look more posh than the Sienna. I then went to an AWD Small SUV thinking that maybe in snowy CT - it would be better for us. WRONG. I have been off the road 4 times during our last winter and that was on new tires! This car is going back and I am returning to the Sienna XLE AWD with Nav. Brilliant ride, everything we need, could store the grandparents and the kitchen sink if we want and it has a higher driving position than the Odyssey, which I do like also. In fact, shoulder and head room are also very generous and with some over 6-footers in our family, that is really important. I'd do AWD winter tires during the winter on the Sienna and will be a happy girl again. Just don't call me soccer mom....


CTmechE, all Honda pilots have tow hitch. It is covered with a piece of plastic that comes off with two thumb screws. You can see the bulge in the middle of the bumper..

@minh: My '07 Pilot is not equipped with a hitch, fyi.

It has recently become necessary for my family to consider sliding doors and increased cargo room so we are shopping for a minivan.

AWD and snow tires are a must considering we live in a hilly rural area of WI with inadaquate snow removal.

I would prefer to stick with Honda since I value the service that my AWD Pilot has given me until now. It is unfortunate that they have not addressed this particular need.

At this point, Toyota seems to be the likely choice in this case. My wife loves her Highlander and won't give it up.

With a sticker between $30K - $40K, AWD should absolutely be an option, in my opinion.

Why Toyota ditched the spare tire concept in favor of run-flat tires is beyond me! That all-but-eliminates the possibility of finding decent snow tires to accompany the AWD feature set...unless I'm ignorant on that issue.

Martin Lange

I deliver mail on a rural route.I recently purchased a 1998 Dodge caravan with awd.I love the awd and the space inside.If Chrysler builds a awd van again I would buy one.I travel gravel roads that vary from loose gravel to mud to snow and get through it all .

James Grosclaude

Live in Pa. Own a Dodge Stow&Go Dodge Caravan. We bought it because we haul a lot of stuff and love the fact that the seats fold into the floor and the entire space behind the front seats is totally flat, but we can not get any traction. We slide on wet roads. That is terrible. We spend a lot of time in Florida and have slid around on wet roads down there. We also spend a lot of time in Pa in the snow and slide everywhere. We need 4 wheel Dr. We need 4 wheel Dr and stow and go seats. They are both equally important to us ( 4 wheel wheel Dr for security and stow & go for the way we live and what we do in life) Why can't we have both in the same vehicle?

"I also can't stand SUVs is what they represents." Stupidest thing I ever heard, what do SUV represent to you? You live in body? I have a 3 series with rft and awd, there's less hills in RI but the roads are poorly plowed by sub contractors, my car bottoms out with the poorly plow roads that ices up. A minivan has about 1.5" of clearance than my car and SUVs or big crossovers are over 3". You're just a moron, two different type of vehicles, SUVs are body on frame built to be tough unlike mini vans. I hate idiots who have no knowledge about automobile and what they represent.


We're up at Lake Tahoe, normally getting 300 inches of snow, and with the pass to Reno topping out at 8900'. Just about every minivan around here is an AWD Sienna.

I've had snow tires on ours, but some of the top tier touring tires seem to do just as well, and the Pirelli P7 all-seasons I just put on are ranked by tirerack users as being better than most non-studded winter tires. For those worried about no spare (which bugs me), there is space for a donut or even full size spare in the back behind the rear seats.

We would have considered an Odessey if it had an AWD option, but the Sienna was the only real choice (a used town & country could have worked, but my parents were burned by their '86 caravan, and I remember many family road trips where it broke down even when relatively new and well under 100k). Our '06 has pretty good clearance, and I don't worry about it in the snow even though I prefer my '92 4runner if I don't need all the baby seats. So far really about the only thing I dislike about it is not having the built in security blanket of an on-board spare. A can of fit-a-flat can help in most cases, but I've been in a few where it wouldn't have. Thus in the first few years I'd throw a snow tire into the back for a long trip, since we have them on a separate set of rims.

AWD isn't needed by all, but to live a normal life here in snow country it is. And it sure is nice to never have to put on chains. Just remember that all cars have 4-wheel brakes, so AWD or 4wd doesn't give you super powers to stop on the snow. Turn or brake on snow or ice, but not at the same time.


A couple of comments to add:
1) Trailers - with a decent sized trailer on a wet, sloped boat ramp or across a field for camping, I've wished for power to the rear wheels many times. Next car WILL be AWD. I'm in a snow area, and with front wheel drive and traction control, I very rarely wish that I had AWD.
2)Loss of spare tire - Every other minivan manufacturer dropped AWD for storage. Toyota is the ONLY one that dropped the spare tire for AWD. Necessary trade-off in my opinion.


The Stow and Go concept in the Caravan is a mystery to me. The seats are nasty thin pieces of rubbish. People buying a minivan are doing so for the seating, not the vacant space. If Dodge wants the trademan market they should offer a version for them and improve their crap seats in the family version.

The Ford Flex is a AWD option but... a lack of sliding doors is turning me off that one.


If our Odyssey ever gives out (140K, and going strong), I will be forced to look at the Toyota Sienna AWD, because even with mounted snow tires, our van cannot compare to our AWD Subaru with snow tires. The safety and security are worth brand switching, to get AWD.


I live in Missouri. I've been driving a 4wd Suburban for years. Camping in the Ozarks, pulling a boat, unplowed roads. I'd like a more thrifty minivan, because of the sliding doors, that has AWD or 4WD. Not interested in 3rd row seating at all. Want to carry a spare. Need enough power to pull a jet boat or catamaran sail boat, not a huge boat. The 3rd row seat has never been inside the truck. The 2nd row seat is usually folded down for a large flat 4x8 area. I'm frustrated that no one makes one like this.


I have a Sienna AWD. I really like it for all of the reasons mentioned above, except one. The run flat tires. They wear out unbelievably fast, like once a year. They're like pencil erasers! Really, really expensive pencil erasers! It's too bad, too, because on that alone I might look to get a different type of car. I just can't see spending $500 to $1,000 per year on tires. We've had to use the run flat feature twice...just to get us to the tire store to buy new tires.

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App