Another Reason Your Mileage May Vary (for the Worse): Ethanol


"Actual results will vary for many reasons," says the fine print below the EPA gas mileage on any new car's Monroney sticker. The sticker then lists a few of them: driving conditions, driving style, vehicle maintenance.

There's one more: ethanol.

These days more than 95 percent of gas sold is E10, said AAA spokesman Michael Green. E10 is 10 percent ethanol and came into use after amendments in 1990 to the Clean Air Act, according to the Department of Energy. All cars are certified to run the stuff; in fact, it's difficult to find ethanol-free gas anymore.

Yet the more efficient ethanol-free blend is what the EPA uses to produce gas mileage figures posted on that new-car sticker.

And there's the problem. Ethanol's lower energy density leads to worse gas mileage, which is why using E85 (85 percent ethanol) in cars that accommodate it is usually a bad idea. The math carries to E10, which has up to 10 percent ethanol. A gallon of E10 has 96.7 percent of the energy in one gallon of gasoline, according to the DOE's Alternative Fuels Data Center.

That means E10 fractionally lowers real-world gas mileage. How much? Try about 3 percent, said Toyota Senior Energy Researcher Mike McCarthy and Ford powertrain spokesman Paul Seredynski. AAA's Green and the EPA both pegged the E10 loss between 3 and 4 percent. That means a car that sports a 30 mpg EPA combined figure is already hampered from achieving that number. The starting line is really 29 mpg.


Too Much Variation?
Why doesn't the agency account for this? The EPA tackles the issue on its website.

"Changing [testing regulations] would be somewhat problematic," the agency said. "While it is common for gasoline pumps to allow for up to 10 percent ethanol, the actual amount of ethanol blended into the gasoline varies greatly, and fuel blending requirements vary by state. Changing the test methods would also make it difficult to compare vehicles tested with ethanol blends with those tested with straight gasoline. So, without a national standard for blended regular gasoline and a federal mandate to change the test fuel used, the EPA will not change the test fuel."

The explanation has merit. The only requirement for E10 is that it carries a maximum 10 percent ethanol, after all. And E10, while widespread, isn't everywhere. Toyota's McCarthy said exceptions include states such as Alaska and rural markets where ethanol distribution is difficult, as well as stations that pump ethanol-free fuel for marine engines. As recently as 2011, the Energy Information Administration reported ethanol levels in areas like the Rocky Mountains are below 8 percent.

But the case is thin today. Ethanol is on the rise. Total ethanol supply stood at 9.65 percent of all U.S. gasoline consumption in 2012, according to EIA; that's up from 8 percent in 2010 and just 4.8 percent in 2007.

And just about all of that is E10. EIA argues that higher-ethanol gasoline like E85 and the still-debated E15 (15 percent ethanol) could throw off the ratio, but those volumes are scant. In a Nov. 29 proposal to reduce ethanol in gasoline due to limited supply, the EPA projected that ethanol-free gasoline (E0) and E15 "would be essentially zero" in 2014, and E85 would account for just 0.8 to 2.3 percent of all ethanol production.

That means, in all likelihood, E10 pumps average somewhere between 9 and 10 percent ethanol. Given that the fuel cannot be more than 10 percent ethanol, variations must be slight.

We reached out to multiple EPA sources to discuss the matter, but we have yet to obtain an interview.

29 mpg vs. 30 mpg
The E10 mileage penalty, meanwhile, adds up to about 1 mpg in a given car that's EPA rated at 30 mpg combined city/highway. The penalty is slight, but every bit adds up — especially as EPA ratings have come under fire this year, and perhaps deservedly so. In August 2013, Ford reduced EPA mileage for the C-Max Hybrid to 43 mpg from 47 mpg. The automaker's original EPA rating used the agency's now-controversial "general label" rule. One day later, the EPA said it would revamp its rating system and hire more employees to audit mileage figures certified by automakers.

The EPA needs to adjust for E10 because it faces a credibility crisis if it doesn't. Drivers are fed up with bad mileage: In J.D. Power and Associates' 2013 Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout study, fuel economy ranked at the bottom of customer satisfaction.

"From a consumer's perspective, when they see 35 miles per gallon city ... that's what they expect," said Mike VanNieuwkuyk, J.D. Power's executive director of global automotive. "They look at it as a mandate of what they should experience."


Still a Comparison Tool?
That illustrates another issue. EPA mileage numbers have undergone myriad revisions to more closely reflect real-world driving, but stakeholders insist that they remain, at heart, a comparison tool.

"Because EPA protocols provide consistent test results, they allow customers to make uniform comparisons between different vehicle makes and models," Toyota's McCarthy said.

At they do a decent job of it. Take the owner-observed mileage satisfaction in J.D. Power's APEAL study. Surveyed owners are, in theory, a more randomized group than drivers who report their mileage to the EPA. But APEAL's ratings don't show mileage. Rather, they depict a mileage satisfaction score that reflects everything from observed mileage to premium-fuel requirements and driving range. analyzed APEAL satisfaction scores for several popular vehicle classes and compared EPA ratings for mainstream versions of those cars. In most cases, the results suggest EPA numbers serve as a proper comparison. The agency rates the 2013 Honda Odyssey, for example, at 21 to 22 mpg (combined city/highway) depending on transmission. Driver-reported satisfaction from APEAL placed the Odyssey in the top tier of owner-reported fuel economy for minivans. By comparison, the EPA rates the 2013 Chrysler Town & Country at 20 mpg combined. In APEAL's owner-reported mileage satisfaction, the minivan placed two tiers down from the Odyssey.

Whether owners actually averaged 20 mpg in the Town & Country, however, is anybody's guess.

"The EPA sticker was never designed to tell you what [fuel economy] you can expect to get from your car," Ford's Seredynski said. "It is a test designed to be very strictly followed by all automakers so that you can compare two cars you are literally window shopping. Only recently has the notion of the test changed in the minds of U.S. buyers."

And, inevitably, they're unhappy about it.

"We often hear consumers saying, 'Well, when I bought the vehicle I thought the sticker said 'X,' and I'm not getting that,' " J.D. Power's VanNieuwkuyk said. "They don't necessarily understand all of the nuances as to what established that original rating."

Voluntary Adjustments
To head off consumer frustrations, automakers could voluntarily rate cars lower than their EPA numbers for E10 or any other internally determined factors. But McCarthy said it would make little sense.

"It's theoretically possible for manufacturers to elect to rate their vehicles lower than EPA numbers," he said. But "any kind of arbitrary reduction would undercut the one of the primary purposes of the EPA metrics: to provide car buyers with standardized data to use when comparing vehicles on the market."

Seredynski said adjusting figures for real-world driving "would be awesome," but it's easier said than done.

"How much should they be adjusted down?" he said. "To what style or manner of driving would be considered some sort of the mean? You? Me? An aunt? Great questions, and I've no idea. But the idea that the labels should reflect what the average Joe actually gets while driving is a relatively new concept, for the U.S., which is pretty fascinating."

Automakers use those mileage ratings to market their cars, especially today, and it's often a figure that's easier for car shoppers to wrap their head around than horsepower or torque. After all, drivers see mileage returns at the pump, on a trip computer or even on smartphone apps.

Now there's one more reason why those figures may never add up to what they saw on the sticker.

EPA to Update Procedures to Keep Up With Industry
Loopholes and Fuzzy Math: The Tangled Science of MPG Ratings
More Industry News

By Kelsey Mays | December 30, 2013 | Comments (13)



If you want to find stations that sell ethanol-free gas:

(I have no relationship with this website, other than using it to find ethanol-free gas.)


Frankly, it is time for Premium gasoline to be just that. 100% gasoline, and 93AKI
Let regular fuel be laden with ethanol, hell even make it 15%.
That way if you would like to cut back from the current 10%, you then purchase mid-grade, which would be 7.5% ethanol.

Flashback: the study that thought adding ethanol was flawed, and the composition of the fleet that uses carburetors is negligible.


The benefits of ethanol in gasoline in concentrations no greater than 10 percent outweigh the mileage penalty, imo. There use to be a phenomenon in cold weather states called "fuel line freeze up," where the water in your gasoline would freeze solid as it traveled to the engine, choking off the fuel supply and stranding you. To prevent this you would pour an additive containing alcohol in the gas tank to absorb the water. No need to do that now with the ethanol blended fuel. Diesel fuel carries a lot more water than gasoline, and some of the current diesel fuel additives contain, you guessed it , alcohol.


Last time I saw a bumper sticker that reads something like this:
Ethanol belongs to my gas tank, not my car's.

Thanks Bob for sharing the Ethanol-free page, that's a great resource that deserves to be shared.


The fuel line that supplies port injection retains its pressure when the vehicle is stopped-via check valve. That way any water, if there is any, that a modern fuel pickup point-which no longer scrapes the bottom of the barrel, doesn't freeze in the fuel line.

Carburetor vehicles needed that Heet/Iso-Heet. Purely direct injection may need that because the in tank fuel pump only moves the fuel to the high pressure fuel pump.
Toyota/Denso's D4-S port/injection system is the exception (and the new Audi/VW/Lamborghini like system)

The mileage window sticker should also specify the tire pressure used for testing.


Your theory that water stored under pressure in a fuel line won't freeze is flat wrong. The impact of pressure on the freezing point of water is negligible, unless you're talking about tremendous pressures outside the automotive realm. For instance, water pressure in home plumbing is about 70 psi. At that pressure the water still freezes at 32 degrees. The typical electric fuel pump produces a maximum of 90 psi, not enough to affect the freezing point of water in the line. There are charts that illustrate this. Diesel vehicles have been fuel injected forever, yet many incorporate fuel line heaters to prevent ice crystals from clogging the fuel line and fuel filter. That fact alone disproves your statement.


If you are relying on the EPA for gas mileage estimates plan on being disappointed. Real world gas mileage is almost always lower, with or without ethanol added. If you want actual mpg figures on a vehicle check out a Consumer Reports review.


It wasn't a theory, it was a conditional supposition. IF there is any water in the fuel.

Since the fuel tanks no longer vent to the atmosphere, there is less dirt in the fuel tank, allowing for the fuel pickup to pull to the bottom 1/2 % of the tank.

What does Scandinavia do in the winter?


if diesels have heated fuel lines it's probably not to prevent ice formation, but to prevent wax formation from the longer-chained molecules in diesel fuel.


Conditional supposition? You supposed wrong.

Diesel fuel is plagued by gelling and wax formation, and that is why they mix it thinner in cold weather regions to prevent the problems you stated. Since diesel fuel is hygroscopic there is water in all its different formulations, and ice crystals will form in cold weather, plugging the fuel filter and even causing worse problems. A fuel line heater prevents ice formation, as do special diesel fuel additives.


My two vehicles consistently get 9% lower mileage with E10 compared to regular gasoline. I am lucky to have a nearby station where I fill with regular. Even at 30 cents more a gallon for regular, with my high mileage vehicles (30 & 43 mpg), it is cheaper.

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App