Several Compact Crossovers Fail IIHS' Small Overlap Test

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's newest test — frontal small overlap — is pretty tough to ace. The agency recently performed the test, meant to simulate a crash of a vehicle's front corner into another vehicle, a tree or a pole, on 13 compact SUVs; 11 scored Marginal or Poor.

The new-for-2014 Subaru Forester came out ahead of the pack, earning a Good score and the agency's highest overall safety rating, Top Safety Pick+. Behind it is the slow-selling 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport; it pulled an Acceptable score. The test group included 2014, 2013 and 2012 models.

"Two-thirds of the vehicles had Poor ratings for structure, and about half of them were Poor or Marginal for restraints and kinematics, meaning the dummy's movements weren't well-controlled to prevent contact with hard surfaces," IIHS said in a statement. The agency cites Nissan's Rogue as one that demonstrated poor structure; its door-frame front pillar was pushed inside the occupant compartment, almost touching the driver's seat. The Jeep Patriot also had big problems, IIHS reported. The dummy's head slid off the front airbag because the steering wheel moved several inches up and to the right. Also, its side curtain airbag didn't deploy, and the seat belt didn't properly restrain the dummy.

The others in the test group earned the Top Safety Pick status, given to vehicles that earn Good ratings in moderate overlap front, side, rollover and rear crash tests, regardless of their small overlap scores. They include the BMW X1, Buick Encore, Ford Escape, Honda CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sportage, Mazda CX-5, Volkswagen Tiguan and the 2014 Patriot. IIHS says the 2013 Patriot only qualifies if it has the optional side torso airbags.

The test group also included the two-door Jeep Wrangler and Nissan Rouge; neither fared well. Toyota's RAV4 also earned the Top Safety Pick award, but wasn't put through the frontal small overlap test at Toyota's request. According to IIHS, the automaker asked for a delay in order to make modifications to the compact crossover.  

IIHS added the new test to its safety evaluation lineup last year and few vehicles have done well. In the test, 25% of a vehicle's driver-side front end crashes into a 5-foot-tall rigid barrier at 40 mph.

According to a 2009 IIHS study of vehicles with Good frontal crash ratings, small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front-seat occupants.

Related
Mercedes, Lexus and Audi Fail Latest IIHS Crash Tests
Tougher IIHS Crash Test Could Mean Fewer Top Safety Picks
More Safety News

Comments 

boeingboy

Given Toyota requested the Rav4 not be tested, can other automakers also ask that their models not be tested for fear of failure?That seems a bit telling....

Kj

What about the RAV'S already sold? Are the owners of these vehicles possibly compromising their safety by driving them?

Derrick G

Toyota doesn't get to have their vehicle not tested at all, just delayed. The IIHS allows that because it encourages makers to make changes. But a manufacturer can otherwise only request that their vehicle be re-tested at its own expense or tested earlier than planned, also on their dime.

As for those already sold, it's safe to assume they're not as safe as later ones will be, but how much that compromises safety is something we won't know. It's fair to say that even the vehicles that got poor overall ratings in the test still posted low overall force measurements for the head/neck and chest regions, where the real threat of death is.

cjm

There's no such thing as a two door Rogue.

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App
Ask.cars.com