First Drive: 2013 Acura ILX

Acura ILX
When Acura introduced its 2013 ILX sedan at the 2012 Chicago Auto Show, we wondered why the company would add another small sedan, just under the TSX in size and price. We also wondered if the demand truly exists for a luxury car of this size and price, which was projected by Acura as "well under $30,000." (We published complete pricing information last night.) But I had wondered the same thing about the Buick Verano, and once I drove that model and saw the differences between it and the Chevrolet Cruze on which it's based, I couldn't deny its appeal.

To make a decision on the ILX, I'd have to drive it. Yesterday I did—all three variants: the 2.0L, 2.4L and 1.5L Hybrid.

Automakers get cagey when you start talking about shared platforms, especially between brands of disparate cost and reputation. Acura openly acknowledges that the new entry-level ILX shares its foundation with the recently redesigned Honda Civic, but also points out the mechanical differences between the two.

For one, the ILX is lower and about 1.5 inches wider than the Civic, and its torsional rigidity (the body's resistance to twisting) is greater, by 18% in front and 11% in rear. The ILX uses different shock absorbers, called amplitude reactive dampers, typically found in European luxury cars. The two-piston systems are said to provide a soft ride without sacrificing sharper bump absorption or cornering performance.

The ILX also has a faster steering ratio and upgraded hardware, such as a larger-diameter steering shaft, for improved feel. There's more noise abatement as well: thicker window glass, more insulation and active noise cancellation in models with 17-inch wheels, among other measures.

How does this all translate to the driving experience?

First I drove the 2.4, which is most like the Civic Si in that it has a 201-horsepower. 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine and comes only with a six-speed manual transmission. As expected, it's quick, though the torque peak of 170 pounds-feet doesn't give the car the urgency some drivers want off the line. The engine and exhaust sound pretty good, but it gets loud and intrusive as the revs climb to where you'll get the most out of it.

The manual is satisfying, once you get beyond the unreasonable expectations evoked by its shift lever. (The sight of that shifter always recalls the Honda S2000, but alas nothing has ever matched that car's rifle-bolt precision.) The gear ratios are well-matched to the cause.

Despite the special provisions, the steering feel is lacking. Torque steer is under control, though it seems to come with a stiffening of the steering wheel, which is perhaps a countermeasure enacted through the electric power steering.

Where the ILX 2.4 is most like the Civic Si is in the most disappointing way: body roll. This trim level has the same suspension tuning as the other models, and it simply needs more control over body lean. Without the confidence and roadholding that comes with competent body control, the 2.4's extra power is mostly wasted.

The ride quality is pretty good, though, exhibiting the road-surface awareness we expect from Acura—without undue punishment on one extreme or wallow on the other.

I also drove the ILX Hybrid, Acura's first, whose mileage (originally estimated at 35/38 mpg city/highway) is now an officially EPA-estimated 39/38 mpg. It's significantly lower than the Civic Hybrid, at 44/44 mpg.

Though the powertrain hardware is the same and the ILX Hybrid has a rear spoiler and low-rolling-resistance tires, the Acura doesn't make as many aerodynamic concessions. It's also about 100 pounds heavier and its hybrid system is tuned for greater responsiveness.

On the road, the hybrid doesn't exhibit too much of the delayed acceleration response we've come to tolerate in many hybrids—known as the rubber-band or motorboat effect—at least not when accelerating from a stop. There's more of it if you nail the gas once already in motion, but three drive modes let you trade mileage for responsiveness: The Econ button makes the car reticent to rev the engine, the Sport mode keeps the revs higher all the time and the normal Drive mode, as you'd expect, is right in between. Not a bad arrangement. If those don't work for you, you can use the steering-wheel paddles to select among seven fixed ratios for the continuously variable automatic transmission.

The ILX Hybrid isn't quick and the brakes have a dreadfully mushy pedal, but if you go into it with proper hybrid expectations (quirky acceleration and braking, not much liveliness or fun), it should satisfy you.

With a 2.0-liter four-cylinder rather than the Civic's 1.8-liter, the ILX 2.0 strikes a good balance, which is what Acura intended. It didn't feel demonstrably quicker than the Civic to me, though, perhaps because of the increased weight—about 145 pounds more than the automatic-equipped Civic EX. The five-speed automatic is well-behaved, providing smooth shifts and quicker kickdown when it's time to pass.

The ILX is definitely quieter than the Civic, though not exceptionally quiet, and if memory serves, not as serene as the Verano. Rather than a pitter-patter when traversing pavement cracks and tar patches, the tires emit more of a distant low-frequency drumbeat.

It goes without saying that the ILX's interior quality is better than the Civic's widely criticized cabin (which Honda has acknowledged). All of the test cars I drove had at least the Premium option package and thus perforated leather-and-vinyl seats, which are well-executed. The dashboard has low-gloss soft surfaces, and the center control panel has an interesting finish. Less impressive is the silver-gray trim elsewhere and the black plastic at the front of the armrests and around the door handles.

A little more consistency would help, as would some color, especially when the ILX is up against the Verano. With the exception of the optional ivory-colored seats and select surfaces in our 2.0 test car, this Acura is characteristically black and gray.

My day of driving ILXes ended with an interstate trip back to with the 2.0 for further evaluation, and the seats proved comfortable even after five hours of highway driving. Did Acura produce a better Civic? Of course. But is the $25,900 ILX better than the $22,585 Verano or other competitors? I'm skeptical, but I and the other editors will scrutinize this volume model and publish a full review in the near future.


By Joe Wiesenfelder | April 20, 2012 | Comments (16)



They should've made the screen standard like on verano. When you don't have nav you get a small screen under the big hood and it looks like and afterthought. The base engine should have 180hp or more at this price. There is little reason to settle for 150hp at this price point when other compacts and midsizers easily match the mileage of this car with more power. A few days back people were talking about how the malibu eco didn't make sense because other non hybrids were as efficient. Same argument applies here, the new altima and fusion 1.6l will be larger, more powerful and yet more efficient for less money


mazda3S probably rides better than this and its more powerful.


The R20 engine is insufficient for 2900-3000 pounds of fun. Sure Honda has played with the gearing of their non-planetary 5 speed automatic transmission. The 2.4 should be the base engine, and should have an automatic connected to it.
Maybe Honda is waiting for their 'earth dreams' direct injected 2.4 & CVT transmission


I'm sure a smaller version of the upcoming accord di 2.4l will eventually find its way into this car. Too bad honda didn't have anything better ready NOW.


From the tone of this article I'm sensing the Buick Verano may be a better contender in this segment.


A rather lukewarm review--but I don't find it surprising at all given the fact that Acura could only equip this car with its dated 5 speed automatics and dated carryover engines. I would add that the styling isn't very attractive either and the dated bland styling is even uglier since Acura continues to blight the automotive landscape with its hideous, beak grille which Acura should have abandoned years ago as it has no redeeming value and for me is a deal breaker.


It would go against Honda's current marketing strategy to have the 2.4 as the standard engine in the ILX.
They should fix that, and they are going to drop one of their sedans [the TL I think], and when that happens the 2.0 can be dropped from the ILX,the 2.4 can be dropped from the TSX.


its too bad the ILX is crippled because Acura is waiting to discontinue the TSX. It needs a better engine now. even the Focus has a better standard engine than this "luxury" vehicle. The Dart will have two engines offering more power. The verano will get a turbo that will far outpower the ILX 2.4L and be offered with an automatic. I dont get Acura's strategy here.


hmm, i'm not sure why my post got deleted. it was either for having to point out that you guys (the editors) continue to fail to do basic research or implying that you use the internet for something other than that function. either way, my point was valid, the verano shares the delta II platform with the cruze, but it is based on the opel astra. in fact, it's an astra with a truck (and a buick grille).

and it's unfortunate that i routinely find that your due diligence is lacking when it comes to the 'facts' you post. your chosen profession is automotive journalist, so do the research. i suppose it's my fault that i'm able to research cars available in europe and asia and you (the editors) don't see the need to...that is today's social craze...blame shifting.


Carryover engines and trans? Soft riding? This is just poor product planning from Acura. They say they're targeting young adults but I think they want a little more than what they're offering. This vehicle should have been the next Honda Civic. They should keep the TSX because its the best selling model they have, made the TL compete with the BMW 5, and make a real rear drive flagship. Its funny after 20 years they can't figure out what to do with their cars.


Wish they offered a gray interior. I hate beige interiors, black isn't much better--too dark inside the car.


I just returned from the Acura dealership and looked at the new ILX. I am 6'4" and was disappointed about the seats and passenger legroom. I was not able to stretch out in the passengers seat. No lumbar support on the drivers seat.


This car is so much better looking than the afterthought styling of the verano. The hp difference won't be one of anything but on paper. This car will smoother, faster, and have better driving dynamics.

Is Acura ILX Essentially a luxury version of the Honda Civic? -


I like the ILX for it's styling and entry price point but once you realize you aren't getting leather or other standard features a entry luxury car would provide you have no choice but to upgrade to the Luxury package which costs $30K which is the TSX territory. Speaking of the the TSX it seems that its days are numbered and it will be replaced by the cheaper ILX. Personally I don't care if the ILX starts at $25K+ just give me standard Luxury features like leather. I feel 150HP is so Civic esque, a 2.4 with automatic would have been perfect for this car if it was a STANDARD feature. In the end the ILX isn't a BAD car but for $26K you hope to be getting more than a refined Civic. I was looking at a used Accord Coupe EXL V6, ILX Premium, or TSX. Since the TSX will be discontinued it's off my list, and since the ILX is under powered and overpriced I will pass, which leaves me with the Accord Coupe. I wish it was an Acura but oh well.


Wow! It is nice to hear about impressions of man, who keeps this car! I read a lot about it on, it looks like very nice car! But it feels on the long distance?

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App