Top 10 Best and Worst Chicagoland Driver's Ed Fleets

In the Chicago Tribune's investigation of high school driver's ed fleets with, some scored quite well, while others delivered embarrassing results in terms of safety. Below we break down the best and worst fleets. If you're not familiar with the area, you might recognize the make and models listed being used at schools near you. See how they would make the grade.

We looked at each car’s crash-test ratings as determined by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, giving 50 points for a score of Good (the top score), 25 points for Acceptable, 10 points for Marginal and zero points for a Poor rating. We calculated each car’s score as a percent of the best possible score, added up all the scores for one district and finding the average. The best possible average score is 100 points. We only looked at districts that reported having at least five cars in their fleet, in order to get a decent sample size. See the complete list of school fleets at

In scoring, we gave every district the benefit of the doubt in several ways:

  • We didn’t penalize cars that were so old (or new) that they didn’t face IIHS crash tests.
  • Whenever a rating would rise based on an assumption, we assumed the best for a district’s cars. For example, in many cases a crash test rating would improve from Poor or Acceptable to Good if optional side airbags were included. We found that many schools were unaware if they had purchased that option, so for the purposes of scoring, we acted as if they did to give them the benefit of the doubt.

The editors at prefer IIHS crash-test scores because their tests are more rigorous — and better reflect real-world crash situations — than those conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The districts with the safest cars in 2010 and 2011 have, not surprisingly, some of the newest cars in school fleets around the Chicago area. Here’s a district-by-district look at the top performers:

No. 1 (tie) Bloom Township District 206 (Chicago Heights, Ill.)
Grade: A+
Avg. score per car: 100 points
The school district’s entire fleet is made up of Dodge Avengers, which have good ratings for front, side and roof-crush ratings, but there’s an added bonus: The Avenger is a noted laggard in the speed department, making this a good way to rein in teens who might want to drive with a lead foot.

No. 1 (tie) Orland Park, Ill., Community High School District 230
Grade: A+
Avg. score per car: 100 points
Here’s one district that made a good, all-in bet on its cars: Its fleet of 2009 Honda Civic gets a good rating in all four crash tests, making it a good choice for young drivers. It also doesn’t hurt that the Civic has excellent resale value. In addition, while the Civic has good passing power, it doesn’t jump off the line, which will help keep teen drivers safer.

No. 3 Niles, Ill., District 219
Grade: A+
Avg. score per car: 99 points
Niles gets high marks for having very new cars, which score well in crash-test ratings. Still, not everything is perfect; the district also has three Chevrolet Camaros in its fleet. While the Camaro is a striking car, and fun to drive, its high horsepower, limited rear visibility and rear-wheel-drive make it a trying car for new drivers. While perfectly fine for experienced drivers, it’s not a common-sense choice for teenagers just learning how to drive.

No. 4 (tie) Lyons Township High School District (La Grange, Ill.)
Grade: A
Avg. score per car: 96 points
Lyons Township is a little unusual in that its fleet is made up entirely of Hondas and Toyotas. While those automakers are certainly well known to consumer car shoppers, those two nameplates make up only 7% of the drivers’ education fleet at the Chicago-area school districts that we examined.

No. 4 (tie) J. Sterling Morton School District 201 (Berwyn, Cicero, Ill.)
Grade: A
Avg. score per car: 96 points
Although this district chose well in picking up a fleet of 2011 Chevy Malibus, it was hurt by the couple of 2011 Chevy Impalas in the fleet. The Impala is a bigger car, but its rear crash tests lag the Malibu.

No. 6 Naperville, Ill., District 203
Grade: A
Avg. score per car: 95 points
District 203 is very much a Ford family of cars. Most are sedans (Focuses and Fusions), but also with a crossover thrown in (the Edge).

No. 7 Community High School District 218 (Blue Island, Oak Lawn, Palos Heights, Ill.)
Grade: B
Avg. score per car: 86 points
This district’s fleet is made up of 2009 Fords and Chevys, and while the crash test scores are not bad, it seems likely that they’ll be looking to upgrade their fleet soon, which should improve their already good standing.

No. 8 Rich Township District 227 (Olympia Fields, Park Forest, Richton Park, Ill.)
Grade: B
Avg. score per car: 84 points
This district’s purchases are very mainstream: A typical blend of GM and Ford models. Like most schools, there are many sedans with a couple of SUVs thrown in. Its score is dragged a bit by the Pontiac G6s it bought. Both Pontiac and the G6 stopped production years ago.

No. 9 (tie) Proviso Township District 209 (Forest Park, Hillside, Maywood, Ill.)
Grade: B
Avg. score per car: 83 points
District 209’s fleet is made up almost entirely of 2010 Ford Focuses (there’s one 2011 model), and that model only gets acceptable ratings in the side crash tests it faced.

No. 9 (tie) Thornton Township District 205 (Dolton, Harvey, South Holland, Ill.)
Grade: B
Avg. score per car: 83 points
Like District 209, District 205’s fleet is made up almost entirely of 2009 Ford Focuses, and that model only gets acceptable ratings in the side crash tests.

The Bottom 10 Districts


No. 1 Chicago Public Schools
Grade: F
Avg. score per car: 26 points
Perhaps it’s not surprising that Chicago has the oldest, lowest-scoring fleet for 2010 and 2011, given the district’s size and complexity. Still, its fleet has some appalling vessels, cars that either failed the crash test standards set nearly two decades ago, or were built before crash-testing was widespread. Among the cars still in use today, according to school officials:

  • A 1990 Dodge Shadow, a model that was last produced in 1994, with a starting MSRP of $8,806. The district has three cars still in its fleet that are likely older than the students learning to drive on them.
  • A 1995 Chevy Cavalier, which back in 1995 received grades of “poor” for front and rear crash tests from the IIHS.
  • More than 50 Plymouth Neons and Breezes from 1996-1999. Plymouth, the Neon and the Breeze are all long gone.

According to the information provided by the district, its newest cars are from the 2006 model year.

No. 2 Elgin, Ill., U-46
Grade: F
Avg. score per car: 31 points
Elgin officials seem to have had good intentions in the models they chose: They went for full-size sedans that are larger than the typical compact cars often found in other district fleets. Unfortunately, the 2007 Chevy Impalas suffer from marginal rear crash-test ratings and only acceptable frontal crash-test ratings. The 2004 Ford Taurus models in the fleet don’t have the side airbags that would have raised scores.

No. 3 (tie) Township District 214 (Arlington Heights, Buffalo Grove, Elk Grove Village, Mount Prospect, Rolling Meadows, Wheeling, Ill.)
Grade: F
Avg. score per car: 50 points
District 214 has a very uniform fleet, but it’s an aging one. The collection of 2004 Chevrolet Malibus scores a Poor rating in side crashes, and only an Acceptable rating in rear crash tests. The Poor side crash test rating comes because the cars were bought without the optional side airbags.

No. 3 (tie) Vernon Hills, Ill., District 128
Grade: F
Avg. score per car: 50 points
Vernon Hills has stocked its fleet with minivans. That’s right, minivans. They make sense for teen drivers: Drivers can ride higher than in a typical sedan and many of the suburban teens will find the ride familiar, as children of the minivan and SUV generation. Unfortunately, they are older GM minivans, the 2006 Chevy Uplander. The Uplander, never a huge seller, is plagued by poor crash-test scores; while frontal scores are good, rear and side scores are only poor. The Uplander’s last model year was 2008.

No. 5 Romeoville, Ill., Valley View District 365U
Grade: F
Avg. score per car: 51 points
While the district’s Ford Tauruses all have Good front crash test ratings no matter which model year (they run from 2002-2004), they have only Acceptable or Marginal rear crash-test ratings. In addition, the 2008 Chevrolet Impalas in the district’s fleet fail to get higher than an Acceptable rating in any crash test.

No. 6 (tie) Hinsdale, Ill., District 86
Grade: F
Avg. score per car: 58 points
This district helps to prove a point: Even districts in affluent areas like Hinsdale can make poor choices when it comes to safety ratings. First of all, the district’s fleet is fairly old, with models from the 2006, 2007 and 2008 model years. Next, the district went with larger cars, including the Ford Taurus and Chevrolet Impala, but both have low crash-test scores.

No. 6 (tie) Woodstock, Ill., District 200
Grade: F
Avg. score per car: 58 points
Woodstock’s cars are all over the map, ranging from the 2002 model year to 2010. While the district has chosen mostly sedans, it also has the rare Chevrolet HHR (GM’s answer to the iconic PT Cruiser) among its cars.

No. 8 Warren Township District 121 (Gurnee, Ill.)
Grade: D-
Avg. score per car: 62 points
This district has split its current fleet between the Chevy Malibu and its corporate cousin, the late, lamented Saturn Aura. While the Aura helped raise the average score, the Malibus are a big drag on the overall average.

No. 9 (tie) Elmhurst, Ill., District 205
Grade: D+
Avg. score per car: 69 points
Elmhurst stands out because, in addition to the Ford Tauruses and Fusion that it has, it also has two Toyota Prius hybrids in its fleet. It is one of very few districts that use a hybrid car at all. Unforunately, the 2009 Prius model has marginal rear crash test scores, dragging down the district’s score.

No. 9 (tie) Palatine, Ill., Township District 211
Grade: D+
Avg. score per car: 69 points
District 211 has a fleet of Ford Tauruses that range in model year from 1999 to 2006, which have decent crash test scores. It’s the fleet of Chevrolet Impalas from 2008 that have Marginal rear crash test scores and only Acceptable front crash test scores that drag the school’s fleet average down.

By Patrick Olsen | September 17, 2011 | Comments (7)



I learned to drive on those 1999 Tauruses! Smelled like cat pee, awful!

Derrick G

I'm very surprised no weight was given to ESC, a big help for novice drivers, just like not having a really powerful engine.


Shows Chrysler durability if a 1990 Shadow is still on the job.Match that Chevy! Match that Toyota! Iacocca did good afterall....

Derrick G

Why yes Paul, in your mind it sure does.

Now, Sheth might look at the data and assume that since in '95 CPS purchased a lot of Cavaliers that obviously the Dodges bought in '90 had mostly broken down by then and now the district has only been able to keep 2 still moving, probably by canalization of the corpses of the rest.

In reality, we only know that CPS has two '90 Shadows running, one of which doesn't go on public roads. Not having any information on how many GM or Toyota cars, if any, the district owned in '90, nothing is proved one way or another about GM's or Toyota's reliability vs. Chrysler's for that year. It's really unlikely that the two Shadows left were the only ones purchased in '90, but we don't know if the others were wrecked or blew up or rusted away. But they COULD have been only two bought. So truth is, this shows nothing other than CPS has two running '90 Shadows. Nothing more, nothing less.

Matt C

I learn on a '88 Ford f150 (10 years old at the time) and some mid 80's Nissan car with a stick. You need to learn in the worst possible conditions, so if/when something goes wrong you also learn how to deal with it. ABS and ESC are crutches. Too many people now days drive their car with out any working knowledge of the cars. They just put gas in that one hole and go.

Amuro Ray

@ Matt C,

I disagree with your comment, assuming that it's actually good to learn in those crap-condition vehicles.

As u probably realize, modern vehicles are built with many safety features, and most are standard equipments. ABS, for example, requires an utterly different driving "method" that the non-ABS braking system. In ABS, u brake w/o EVER taking ur foot off the brake pedals; in non-ABS system, u wanted to pump ur brakes, b4 the wheels get locked up. In addition, braking system nowadays have a lot to do with traction control and vehicle stability too.

If kids nowadays are to learn the the old way, they won't be able to use the safety features correctly in modern vehicles, thus causing even more dangerous driving situation.

So, embrace the new safety features, and learn how to get the most out of them. There will just be more and more of those, not less, and not knowing how to use them, effectively, will cause more harm than good!

Matt C.


To me, it is the same as learning learning how to work out a math problem with paper and pencil before getting the privilege of using a computer/calculator.

The idea is to get to know how and why in a car. Why the ABS does what it does, and why the traction control does what it does. I learned on crap cars, but when I got a car with the safety features I had a much better appreciation for them.

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App