2012 Ford Edge, 2012 Ford Explorer EcoBoost: First Drive

Fordecolineup
Ford is addiing its turbocharged EcoBoost engines to the Edge and Explorer crossovers — but not the 3.5-liter powerhouse from the Flex and Taurus SHO. Instead, for 2012, the crossovers get a 2.0-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder whose power rivals a typical V-6: 240 horsepower and 270 pounds-feet of torque. The front-wheel-drive EcoBoost Explorer is EPA-rated at 20/28 mpg (city/highway), while the EcoBoost Edge, gets an impressive 21/30 mpg — nudged to the 30 mark by active grille shutters, which the Explorer lacks.

Both cars are on sale now. Near Ford’s Romeo, Mich. proving grounds last week, we took the people-haulers, well, people-hauling.

Edgeecoboost
With three adults aboard, the EcoBoost Edge proved itself capable from a standing start, punchy as revs climbed. The six-speed automatic can wander on upshifts, but it kicks down multiple gears swiftly. All in all, the EcoBoost suits the Edge well, and for the extra $995 over a front-drive V-6 model — a quicker car, but not by much — it should sell itself. At current gas prices and 15,000 annual miles, you’ll recoup the price with fuel savings in just over 3.5 years, versus the 19/27 mpg V-6 Edge. (What’s more, it doesn’t want premium gas. A Ford official told us the 2.0-liter makes full power on the cheap stuff.)

Explorerecoboost
Ford doesn’t offer the 2.0-liter in the all-wheel-drive Edge, where the system’s 178 extra pounds could blunt the EcoBoost’s punch. Case in point: the EcoBoost Explorer, which is some 500 pounds heavier than the Edge. With three adults, our Explorer needed most of the drivetrain’s reserve power to keep up speed on the hills around Romeo. Sixty-to-70 mph acceleration required multiple downshifts, and the Explorer’s six-speed stumbled where the Edge’s soared. Ford confirmed the crossovers have separate transmissions, plus unique gearing versus their V-6 counterparts — “a little bit more to help with launch” before the turbocharger kicks in, chief engineer Don Ufford said. You can feel it in the Edge, but not in the Explorer.

Ecoengine
The EcoBoost Explorer has enough power, but it will be a harder sell versus the Explorer’s quicker V-6. The performance gap between the two is harder to reconcile. Still, EcoBoost adds 3 mpg — enough to beat even the four-cylinder Toyota Highlander.

Both Fords all but give up their towing ability. The EcoBoost Explorer's capability drops to 2,000 pounds, and the EcoBoost Edge drops to 1,500 pounds (both with 300 pounds aboard), versus 5,000 and 3,500 pounds, respectively, with the V-6. But if you don’t plan to hitch a trailer or go off-roading, the tiny EcoBoost has potential — especially in the Edge.

Comments 

corvette c5

Cup holders for the mechanic?

C5,
That's hilarious. Not the prettiest engine bay by a longshot.

George

I'd prefer the 3.7 V6 with a taller axle ratio 2.77] for front wheel drive than the 3.5 V6 & 3.16 axle ratio.
Better mileage, and way better performance than the ecoboost 2.0.

and for 'awd' the updated 3.5 ecoboost [variable exhaust valve timing] + 2.77 axle ratio.

Matt C.

What could the purpose for those cup holders be? Why so much useless plastic?

jstant01

Why is the Explorer 500 pounds heavier than the Edge? Isn't the Edge a larger vehicle? What's causing the weight?

cody

it will be interesting to see actual mileage numbers from these engines. my bet is that if you drive them and make them perform like a V6, they will return worse mileage than their V6 counterparts, just like the boosted mazda crossover does.

jeff

I've had my ecoboosted explorer for 6 weeks now, driven 700 miles. The majority was mostly flat interstate driving at the speed limit. The rest was easy city driving. I have yet to floor this thing to see what it will do. having said this, I have averaged 22.2 miles to the gallon...The emergency brake is off, there is air in the tires, and I'm driving like there is an egg under my right foot. I've waited two years for this engine in this car that they say will get 28 plus mpg. This thing has no hope of achieving these mpg targets even after break in. I think I should have shopped a little harder with my $40,000.

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App
Ask.cars.com