2012 Saab 9-4X: First Look

Saab94x

  • Competes with: Cadillac SRX, Land Rover LR2, Volvo XC60
  • Looks like: The nearly ready prototype from two years ago
  • Drivetrain: 265-hp, 3.0-liter V-6 or 300-hp, turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6; six-speed automatic transmission; front- or all-wheel drive   
  • Hits dealerships: May 2011

The rebirth of Saab as an independent automaker would founder without a compact SUV. The luxury market is flooded with them, and for most automakers they’re selling extremely well. Saab knows this and that’s why it tried to bring its 9-4X to market as soon as possible. Like the new 9-5, however, it’s a few years behind schedule because of GM’s bankruptcy and sale of Saab.
 
What we see today is no surprise. The 9-4X is Saab’s version of the Cadillac SRX, sporting the same powertrains and similar dimensions. Saab’s all-wheel-drive system, called XWD, is unique and will be optional on base models and standard on the Aero.
 
The engine choices include a 265-horsepower V-6 and on the Aero trim, a 300-hp, turbocharged V-6. Both are teamed to a six-speed automatic.
 
It will be nearly three years since the 9-4X prototype was first shown at an auto show, and the production version will go on sale nearly a year and a half after the SRX hit the market.

Luckily, the 9-4X has completely unique styling to differentiate itself from the Cadillac. The interior looks similar to the new 9-5 sedan, with black being the predominant cabin color along with the green lighting.
 
Saab also provided total cargo volume of 61.2 cubic feet with the second-row seats folded down, and you guessed it, the Cadillac SRX has 61.1 cubic feet of total cargo space.
 
While we may focus on the similarities to the SRX as negatives, that SUV has been a huge success for Cadillac. If Saab can have some of its positive sales rub off on it, it won’t be a bad thing.
 
More photos below.

Comments 

Tony

Now...
It that dash from Optima or Optima has one from Saab?

Otherwise, it is just what people need - another overprices SUV.

Anthony

Optima? Kia? If so, I don't see the comparison.

I hope they've worked on reliability first as it hasn't been their strong suit.

JM

both this and the SRX are just too heavy for the 3.0L V6. it doesnt have enough torque or accessible power to feel up to the challenge for these vehicles.

I also hope that the turbo engine isn't so inconsistent- nobody likes turbo lag any more.

Beautiful!! I have fallen in love with it...

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App
Ask.cars.com