Cars.com Reviews the 2010 Toyota Corolla

Corolla
Cars.com senior editor Joe Wiesenfelder wants to make it clear that when he calls the 2010 Toyota Corolla a competent but ultimately lackluster compact car he’s not just engaging in some trendy Toyota bashing. Calling the Corolla’s 2009 redesign a “missed opportunity,” Wiesenfelder goes on to explain why Toyota has dropped the ball in a crowded segment that’s only growing more competitive with each passing model year.

2010 Toyota Corolla Review

By Stephen Markley | May 26, 2010 | Comments (14)

Comments 

DL

I haven't driven a little econobox for a while now so my reference are from the early 2000's.

I rented one for a few days and found it to be surprisingly unoffensive. By that I mean it is reasonably compliant over bumps, reasonably quiet over most surfaces, and steering feel is not as loosey-goosey as I remembered. The gas mileage is quite impressive. I hate the transmission, which refuses to downshift (in the name of fuel economy I'm sure). Seating position is on par. Not bad.

DL

I mean to say, "... my references are from ..." and "I rented a Corolla." Pardon me!

bowrider

Good review.

Tony

Corollas never been great cars. They are reliable but they have the following issue for many years - interior pieces are falling off or break.
It drives like a box on 4 wheels.
I still don't regret taking Protege in 1998 over Corolla. Protege had more room, rear leg room and more zoom (1.8).

The Corolla is a rare bargain from Toyota. The last time I got price quotes, it was less than a comparably priced Elantra. It's never been a world-beater, but as long as it's cheap, "just okay" is just fine for an economy car.

Tony

Holt,
Corolla is hardly economy car anymore. It is about size of 1991 Camry and it cost $16-18+G. Yaris would be in economy segment now.

Now, how this makes sense?
"....it was less than a comparably priced Elantra..."

Your comparably priced Elantra probably had 10 features Corolla didn't, like rear disc brakes and split-folding rear seat, etc. So, really, Elantra is better value initially.

Where Corolla shines is in cost of ownership. I am sure that fix or insure Corolla is cheaper then Elantra. I am not even going into total loss scenario...

kj

I test drove a Corolla and was highly impressed with the power, handling, and smoothness. Far better car than the go-cart feel of a Civic.

Mark

When this Corolla debuted Car & Driver said it drove like a baby Lexus. Based on other similar reviews we decided to buy our daughter the Toyota instead of a Chevy. After 142,000 miles it still runs like new and that's probably why we've purchased another Toyota.

J

kj,

Seriously? You really feel that the Corolla handles better than the Civic and has more power? Better check the current generation first.

segfault

Might as well bash it for having only a four-speed auto. The Cruze and Fiesta will both have six-speed autos, the Civic has a five-speed auto, and the Sentra has a CVT.

Not sure about the Mazda3. The Elantra is also behind the times with a four-speed auto.

J

segfault,

3 has 5 speed auto

DL

While I agree with Tony that the Yaris fits the "economy car" moniker more, I can also see how Mr Holt thinks that, FOR A TOYOTA, the Corolla is pretty reasonable too.

IMHO Toyota has been riding its reputation pretty hard in the recent past, and its prices are pretty high -- especially considering the skimpy standard equipment (like Tony mentioned). If you are (still) a big Toyota fan, the Corolla is really "just fine." It's a shame not more people realize how great the Mazda3 is ...

Tony

DL, Mazda3 is great. But when you have 4 passengers, especially 6' tall, 3 is no longer an option because it's rear seat is really bad. My 98 Protege seem to be the best 3 they ever made in terms of interior space. 99 model was already changed - more room for driver less for passenger. And it just went down for them. Great driver's car but beyond driver and front passenger... I want to check Forte, they say it has more room for the class. Or, I will just buy 2007 Accord - great size, great fuel economy, almost perfect.

DL

Tony,

I still have fond memories of our '93 Protege, the great balance of sharp steering feel and reasonable suspension firmness. It seems that a lot of automotive journalists agree that the late-90's ones were even better. :)

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App
Ask.cars.com