New Fuel Economy Standards Still Use Old EPA Test

In 2008 the EPA created a new, more accurate test to determine a car’s real-world mileage estimate that appears on every new car window sticker, but the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is still using an outdated two-cycle test to arrive at the corporate average fuel economy number for an automaker’s fleet.

Those fleet fuel economy and CO2 standards were what the Obama administration recently increased and will be phased in over the next five years to at least 34.1 mpg for cars and trucks combined (automakers can use credits for air conditioning improvements to get over the 35 mpg hump).

If the old test is still being used to calculate fleetwide fuel economy, the 34.1 mpg figure set as a requirement actually translates to about 26-27 mpg under the EPA’s test. To reach the goal, cars will only have to hit around 30-31 mpg and trucks 21-22 mpg.

The EPA’s tests uses adjustment factors and new test cycles to get more accurate fuel-economy estimates. This is good for the environment but bad for mileage estimates, which dropped a good deal.

Many cars will still have to improve fuel efficiency, but the amount of improvement is not quite as drastic as advertised. As AutoblogGreen points out, small cars like the Toyota Yaris and Honda Fit as well as midsize hybrids like the Camry Hybrid and Fusion Hybrid all easily top the standard, which means those cars with poorer fuel economy (a Ford Taurus, for instance) will not have to improve as much.

What Cars Today Meet New CAFE Regs? More Than You Might Think (AutoblogGreen)

By Stephen Markley | April 13, 2010 | Comments (2)
Tags: In The News



How are they calculated?
Will the sales volume be considered there?
If GM sells one aveo and 100 surburban, will still GM get a middle mpg number of aveo and surburban?
I think it should be a sales volume weighted number to calculate how much pollutant and gas consumption that automaker is responsible for.
If GM sells one aveo and 100 surburban, their fleet mpg number should be closer to that of surburban. If GM sells 100 aveo and one surburban, their fleet mpg number should be closer to that of aveo.


looks like im in for a new "name" ...

~Ste (original SG)

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App