2009 Acura TL vs. 2009 Audi A4: Part 1
Joe Bruzek and Kelsey Mays, Cars.com
Tough times in the auto biz are giving entry-level luxury cars more relevance than ever. Among the brands that sell them, nameplates like the BMW 3 Series and Infiniti G comprise more than two-fifths of those manufacturers’ sales — and with premium brands tanking as fast as the rest of the industry, that share is likely to go up. Among this year’s crop are two redesigned mainstays, the Acura TL and Audi A4. Both offer all-wheel drive, strong V-6 engines and larger dimensions than their predecessors, but beyond that their personalities differ. Acura heads the way of brute performance and nervy styling, while Audi sticks to classic proportions and interior quality.
In our initial drives, both models earned high praise from the reviewer team — Kelsey Mays in the A4 and David Thomas in the TL. For round deux, we procured two jet-black examples: an A4 3.2 Quattro and a TL SH-AWD. Both test cars had six-cylinder engines, all-wheel drive and automatic transmissions, and as luck would have it, the prices lined up nicely. Well-equipped but not brimming with options, our A4 stickered at $40,400, while our preproduction TL came loaded to the hilt for $42,235. Editors Joe Bruzek and Kelsey Mays put both to the test in a variety of pavement and weather conditions, and they offer their impressions in a two-part series.
Styling
Styling had us split. Right away, the TL’s Roethlisbergeran dimensions dwarf its Audi rival: At 195 inches, it’s even longer than a Honda Pilot, making it easily longer, wider and taller than the A4. It looks louder, too: The shielded grille and bunker-slot headlamps make Acura’s redesigned TSX look downright quaint, and the tail simply defies description.
The A4’s lines are easier to follow, with sharp-looking LED running lights and a nicely sorted, if conservative, tail. The only major sticking point is Audi’s double-decker grille, but it’s been around long enough that we’ve grown fairly accustomed to it.
Deliberations ran hot. One editor lauded the TL’s bold road presence over Audi’s blend-into-traffic shape. The other preferred the A4’s stately lines over the TL’s left-field goings-on. Fists were thrown and Facebook hate-groups formed. In the end we agreed to disagree, calling it a tentative draw. Bah.
Winner: Tie
Performance
With our testers configured to varying levels, deciding which one better suited the sporting driver was a no-brainer. The TL with its Super-Handling All-Wheel Drive system rocks the A4’s Quattro in the corners and offers more grip on curvy on-ramps; at times it even performs with rear-wheel-drive-like balance, something we can’t say for the nose-heavy Audi. Where the A4 starts to drift wide mid-corner, the TL digs for more traction and continues to grip.
The less-powerful and slightly lighter A4, by contrast, has the right power curve and transmission gearing to walk away from the TL in a straight line — this despite the TL making 305 hp versus the Audi’s 265 hp.
For those who don’t need to tackle corners and carve on-ramps, the A4 would be a better pick, with an all-wheel-drive system that’s more at home digging through foul weather. The A4 offers a comfier driving experience, with flat-cushioned seats (the TL SH-AWD has heavily bolstered buckets) as well as easier steering and braking efforts.
Accelerator, braking and steering response are all more precise in the TL, but the tradeoff comes in more road noise. Wind noise, curiously, seems higher in the A4 than the TL. It’s worth noting that our TL SH-AWD tester is essentially the sportiest TL you can get for 2009, whereas our A4 lacked Audi’s S-line sport package. But with nearly identical as-tested prices, adding anything would surely bump the A4’s as-tested price well past the TL’s.
Winner: TL
Interior & Gadgets
If Acura dominates performance, Audi wins on the inside. The TL boasts decent materials and, characteristic of Honda/Acura, some of the best-feeling buttons in any car at any price. But the whole layout seems a bit gratuitous: The steering wheel and center dash have enough controls to pilot an Airbus. The dashboard goes overboard with oddly grained surfaces and plasticky silver trim. The glove compartment and lower door panels trade the previous TL’s soft-touch plastics for harder surfaces, and areas from the steering wheel hub to the overhead sunglass holder feel low-rent for a $40,000 car.
Some TL high points: The seats, especially in back, are roomier than Audi’s. From Pink Floyd to People Under the Stairs, the TL’s optional 10-speaker ELS surround-sound stereo trounces the A4’s 10-speaker system. No doubt Audi’s 14-speaker Bang & Olufsen option would give ELS some serious competition — we’ve experienced it elsewhere, and it’s flat-out terrific — but it would also bump up the Audi’s price by thousands of dollars.
Which brings us to the A4. It’s an exercise in buttoned-down elegance, loaded with premium materials, supportive seats and tastefully styled controls, marred only by a wriggly turn signal here or uneven window switch there. One editor found Audi’s MMI much easier to use than Acura’s knob-based interface, and the A4 won lots of consistent small points thanks to conveniences like a folding backseat without a dangling center seat belt (it’s anchored in the seatback), one-touch operation for all four windows (the TL only has one-touch windows in front), and a height-adjustable center armrest. Add it all up, and Ingolstadt took home the interior contest by a fair margin.
Winner: A4
Stay tuned for tomorrow’s post to find out which car won the day.
Previous
Subscribe to our feed
Email us your tips!
Nice article! More like this one please.
It could also use a few more pictures, especially when comparing interior/exterior design and features.
Awesome!
I have always wanted to see how the new TL stacks up against competition like this. Edmunds did one against the Infiniti G37 sedan...
May I suggest a larger comparison including the previously mentioned Infiniti? Or one with the C Class and 3 Series also?
Car & Driver states that the TL does 0-60 in 6.6 and the A4 3.2 takes 6.9. As much as I like Cars.com you guys blew this one.
PS It wouldn't be fair to introduce the G35 in the test as it would embarrass both cars.
Who are you trying to fool!? You are comparing a stripper A4 that in reality does not exist with a top of the line fully loaded TL. I did a nationwide search via Audi.com and there isn't 1 single A4 3.2 available at that price. In fact according to Audi the cheapest A4 3.2 with NO options would cost $40,475 and that's before the $875 destination charge. I know you guys aren't Edmunds.com but come on!
While it is rare we get such a stripped model to test (usually they're fully loaded) you can find such cars on lots. I did a quick search in the Chicago area on cars.com's new car inventory and found a car equipped exactly the same as ours.
http://www.cars.com/go/search/detail.jsp;?tracktype=newcc&searchType=78&pageNumber=1&numResultsPerPage=50&largeNumResultsPerPage=0&sortorder=descending&sortfield=YEAR+descending%2cPRICE+descending&certifiedOnly=false&criteria=K-|E-|M-_4_|D-_21_|N-Y|R-30|I-1%2c7|P-YEAR+descending%2cPRICE+descending|Q-descending|Z-60622&aff=national&paId=286644428&recnum=97&leadExists=true
Zinc, I don't see where you're getting those numbers. Over at Car and Driver, they tested the TL SH-AWD at 6.0 seconds to 60 mph, and the A4 3.2 did the same in 5.7 seconds. Here are the links.
http://www.caranddriver.com/content/download/131813/1787604/version/1/file/2009+Acura+TL+SH+AWD.pdf
http://www.caranddriver.com/content/download/115197/1563650/version/1/file/2009+Audi+A4+3.2+Quattro+-+Test+Sheet.pdf
The Audi makes more of its power and torque in the lower RPM range. That, along with the A4's fewer pounds and six-speed auto transmission -- compared to the TL's five-speed -- help the A4 achieve better acceleration numbers.
as stated elsewhere, different magazines test cars in different conditions (weather, road, etc) as well as with different setups. test results are largely only comparable within the same setting (i.e., this comparison should only be used to compare the specific cars listed here, not to compare with another magazine's test).
besides, some of those drivers use techniques that most people rarely use (or possibly don't even know how to use).
i am really glad you guys did this test!!! enjoyed reading both parts.
i especially like how you don't go nuts trying to compare track performance like most other major publications, but rather focus on what you think are important for living with driving each on a daily basis. i mean, these are not like an Elise or a Viper.
While I've long appreciated Audi's overall interior execution as much as the next car guy, I think they've been coasting on their center stacks, which strike me as too black-on black and too filled with small undifferentiated buttons.
The TL looks to have the same button density but they are zoned much better. Even in these pictures, the navigation, climate and audio controls are very clearly differentiated. They are also mounted significantly higher, making them easier to identify and reach. The Audio four-spoke steering wheel is pretty uninspiring as well. I'd much rather handle the TL's thick-rimmed 3-spoker; Airbus controls and all.
LOL on your non-description of the TL tail. The A4 definitely has the (non-)edge in that area, though it may be off-set by the TL’s better looking wheels.
Why no MPG figures? They are practically identical (TL: 17/25, A4:17/26), but it's still worth mentioning.
I'm not a fanatic of either just by looking at the pictures i have to say the Audi hands down. spending 40K on a set of wheels it's got to look good.
Interesting comparison here. I am a 2004 TL owner. At the time, I looked at the A4. Unfortunately, the price was higher and the materials were shoddier inside. The A4 with matching options went well over 40K whereas I got my TL fully loaded out for 37K.
Back to this comparison - the Audi interior seems to be more of the same ole boring. It actually looks a decade behind - I don't see any classic elegance here.
Also, why the knocks on the tail of the TL? If anything, slam the nose. The tail is the hottest, sportiest feature of the car.
Audi has a long way to go on price and style to match the TL.
okay, how is it a fair comparison at all if the TL had a sport package and the A4 did not?
Audi doesn't have to match the TL for price or style. They're already a brand leader. Audi was making cars almost 100 years before Acura existed. And what about quattro, one of the most prooven AWD systems ever? Vs some sh-awd crap. Perceived value never outmatches heritage