Cars.com Reviews the 2009 Honda Civic
In a brutal car market, the Honda Civic remains one of the few bright spots: A small, affordable, fuel-efficient car that doesn't make you feel like you're riding around in a glorified tin can. Enjoying a banner year after having briefly become the best-selling car in the country in May, the 2009 Civic looks to keep up its momentum. Cars.com reviewer Mike Hanley explains why it is likely to do so, but how a few minor irritants might also trip up buyers.




The Civic is a fine car, but it looks like a doorstop on four wheels, and costs as much as the much larger Chevy Malibu. The Four cylinder Malibu with the six speed automatic gets the same mileage as the Civic and is much more luxurious. I know brand loyalty is a big thing with Honda buyers, and with good reason, but some serious comparison shopping right now would do Detroit and consumers a lot of good. Please do your part for the domestic manufacturers by at least looking at American cars before buying.
Posted by: Trainer | Nov 18, 2008 5:42:08 PM
Trainer,
I look at my car as an investment. In 5 years, what will the trade in value of the Malibu be as compared to the Civic?
I have limited funds and need to invest in an automobile that I know has a reliable track record, good resale/trade in value and will not make me wonder if my local dealer will even be in business a couple years down the road. I simply don't feel as if a domestic vehicle will do that for me right now.
Posted by: Troy S. | Nov 18, 2008 7:18:39 PM
i prefer the Euro civic better!
Posted by: | Nov 18, 2008 8:27:23 PM
Costs as much as the larger Malibu?
hm...last time I checked, the 4 cylinder Malibu that can mate with the 6AT starts at about 24 grand.
The Civic on the other hand, starts at about 15 grand on the stripped-down-bare-bone model, and fully loaded (if you can have it without leather) at 20 grand plus 5 bucks for a EX 5AT.
So, what does that mean "costs as much"?
Posted by: J | Nov 18, 2008 10:26:08 PM
The Malibu doesn't get anywhere near the Civic in terms of mileage.
You can get 30/40 if you drive like a Grandma.
You can get over 40mpg is you know how the R18 engine works, and you have a sensitive right foot.
Posted by: George | Nov 19, 2008 12:13:34 PM
J, I'm talking the red tag sale price for the Malibu with the six speed of just over 20K - that's Civic territory. The Malibu might cost a touch more than the Civic, but its mileage is really good and it rides nicer than the Civic.
Posted by: Trainer | Nov 19, 2008 12:51:41 PM
George, according to the EPA the 33 mpg Malibu nearly matches the highway mileage of not just the Civic, but the Fit as well - in a much safer package.
Posted by: Trainer | Nov 19, 2008 12:54:34 PM
I've driven a civic (I hate the civic) on a 300mile road trip.
The overall mileage was 44mpg, and that is on E10 regular grade fuel, and we saw 90mph.
Posted by: George | Nov 19, 2008 5:18:32 PM
Trainer,
If you have to go as far as including all the bargain pricing just to get it close to the price range of the Civic, I have nothing else to say to you; and that is NOT Civic territory.
You are using a rebated starter car comparing to a fully loaded model. And saying so righteously that it is in the same price range. Nice try.
Posted by: J | Nov 20, 2008 10:35:07 AM
One last note, try driving that Malibu and beat my city mileage number of 36mpg in the winter before spouting any nonsense might help.
Posted by: J | Nov 20, 2008 10:36:50 AM
I bought 2009 Honda Civic EX thinking I was going to save money on gas compared to my small truck 1996. The civic was very disappointing to me. It is giving me 23 miles in city. You have to drive like an 90 year old grandma if you expect to get 25 or more. I think HONDA is a ripoff. Way too much money for this type of car. And trust me you folks out there who think you can get a better resale value on honda or toyota for that matter you don't. Been there done it. It was very very disappointed how much I could get on my toyota after 3 years. Its value lost more than 7000 dollars in 3 years. Do your research people. To add to this the Honda civic insurance will go up much more than a toyota.
Posted by: david | Feb 12, 2009 10:17:46 PM
David,
You either have a rare Honda that has issues or you need to take another look at how you drive. I have a 2009 Honda Civic EX and the worst MPG it got was 26 mpg in the middle of winter when I would also let the car run 15 minutes or so to warm up as there were several days below 0 degrees. You are also wrong about the resale value. The resale value blows away most "domestic" cars. Another note: the Honda Civic is built in Ohio with 60% US made parts. Many so-called American made cars have 60% parts made from other countries. Some Fords are made in Mexico. So, yes buying a Civic is buying American and helping American jobs.
Posted by: Bruce | Mar 17, 2009 12:40:38 AM
I traded my 2009 Honda Accord EX-L today for a more basic 2009 Honda Civic LX-S. I hate the hard leather seats in the Accord. It got 31mpg on 3 separate road trips and I drove it hard. I'm hoping that my new Civic will set more comfortable.
Posted by: joey | May 30, 2009 10:43:19 PM
Just traded in 1998 CRV with a broken axial and got 4K for it as a tradin on an EX-L. It needs 1,200 work. By the way I have a 2004 Volvo S60T (turbo) that gets 30 on flat highway. It's fairly heavy, fast, luxurious and SAFE.
Posted by: stan brown | Jun 5, 2009 3:54:31 PM
i had a 98 chevy malibu, and it was a piece of junk from day 1. a month after i bought it would randomly stall going down hills and the dealor couldnt figure out why.
I had it for 10 years and there wasnt a year when i didnt spend over 1000 dollars in repairs. I made a mistake of being sentimental and tried to keep that car as long as i did. It was fun to drive and was spacious but sucuked at gas and after 160,000 miles and 10 years ther head gasket was starting to crack and there were somany problems.
I had a chevy celibrity before this (1987) which lasted me over 200,000 miles and was a great car I dont know what the heck GM is doing making horrible cars. I wanted to by another GM car but I just dont have enough money to fix cars. So last week I bought a 2009 civic-ex and its a great car so far. gives me very good gas mileage 35 so far and its drives really well, and has as much room as my 98 malibu, and I am also very impressed with its acceleration considering its only a 1.8L and it feels like a solid car to drive. and i am just happy my dashboard doesnt vibrate and my car wont die going down hills.
So if Chevy doesnt care about its consumers by making such horrible cars then why should i care about Chevy.
Posted by: rain1177 | Jun 9, 2009 8:16:39 PM
I bought a New 2009 Civic EX on April 28, 2009 from my local Honda dealer for $16788 plus tax. I can't tell you how delighted I am. I've had 3 Volvos (before Ford ruined them)and several Buicks. My love affair for both ended 5 minutes after the dealer handed me my new keys. The seamless blending of ride/handling, performance/economy, luxury/economy makes me drop my jaw every time I throw it into a sharp turn at high speed. It's like they gave me a baby beemer without the extra horsepower in exchange for much better gas mileage ... at half the price. I can't even imagine where a Malibu would enter into a logical comparison.
Posted by: Veri Tas | Jul 1, 2009 6:57:48 PM