Driving the Nissan Cube
The Nissan Cube has the distinction of being the Japanese box on wheels that didn't come to the U.S. first and become a surprise hit. That honor goes to the Scion xB, which appeared in 2004 and unexpectedly outsold its more conventionally shaped stablemate, the xA, thereby launching a whole new brand.
Nissan has committed to selling the Cube here starting in the spring of 2009. Now, to be clear, that model will be a whole new generation, not the version Nissan let us play with for a day. All the same, I thought you'd like to get a feel for the Cube, and I never miss an opportunity to wipe the windshield every time I make a turn. You see, this is a Japanese-spec model, which means the steering wheel's on the opposite side of the car and the turn signal stalk is on the opposite side of the steering column. If you've ever switched to a right-hand-drive car, you know exactly what I mean. Fortunately, it was raining when the Cube came, which gave me a day of "I meant to do that”s.
Other aspects were decidedly Japanese — most notably the engine, a 1.4-liter four-cylinder that comes admirably close to producing 100 horsepower.
The 0-60 mph time is somewhere between eventually and don't hold your breath. Having a four-speed automatic didn't speed things along, but something makes me think operating a manual shifter with my left hand would have led to poor results. This Cube had electric all-wheel drive. Flip a dashboard switch and an electric motor drives the rear wheels at low speeds. Technically, this Cube is a hybrid. It doesn't have a battery pack or regenerative braking — just a generator up front that sends juice to the rear. It's not about improving mileage, but to my way of thinking, gas engine + electric traction motor = gas/electric hybrid. In a sense, e-AWD probably does improve mileage, because the added components are lighter than a full transfer case and driveshaft might be. It also keeps the floor relatively flat because there's no need for a drivetrain tunnel and the associated hump.
With AWD switched on, I could hear an added whir from the rear motor, and, as Nissan claims, the off-the-line acceleration improved a bit, going from an amble to more of a mosey. Nissan may choose to equip the U.S. model with a larger engine, which is customary. I'm not sure they should. Even with AWD and the aerodynamics of a tool shed, this one is estimated to get close to 40 mpg. That's what you get with tiny engines.
If more Americans could accept modest (and, in fairness, occasionally inadequate) acceleration, our cost and ecological situations would be decidedly different. Then there's the fact that the original xB had a tiny engine and great mileage, and that didn't seem to hurt it. It's even possible that it helped. The first xB sold here was smaller overall. Where this Cube is about 5 inches shorter from bumper to bumper that it was, and a few inches narrower, it's a full 20 inches shorter than the current xB. This is fine by me. The boxy shape makes for surprising roominess inside, and that's an important attribute in a small, affordable car, especially in today's economic climate. This test car had a bench front seat, which is novel to us Americans, and I liked it. A flip-down armrest with a storage console should more than satisfy the rigid Yanks who've banished the bench in favor of fixed center consoles.
At the risk of offending a Scion fanatic (not that anyone would ever be offended by something in this blog...), I preferred the original xB to the current version. The new one is larger, less boxy and less efficient. It's a real car now, which sounds like a compliment, but there are a lot of real cars out there. It's possible the smaller xB did well because of, not in spite of, its odd attributes. What we'll get in the next-generation Cube is a mystery, but I hope it stays small, efficient and boxy. The most Nissan will say is that it will retain its "Cubeness," which is its asymmetrical design and overall ... gestalt.
Shiro Nakamura, head of Nissan Design, once joked that, unlike some cars, which are designed to look like they're in motion even when standing still, the Cube is meant to look like it's standing still even when it's moving. The Cube, he said, isn't supposed to be a sports car; it's supposed to be fun. The one I drove certainly was.




Decent. Anybody remember if the Dodge Hornet is based on this or the Verse from Nissan
Posted by: DodgeFan | Apr 4, 2008 1:14:58 PM
Love it!
I hope the next generation isn't as diluted as the newer XB was. a 1.4 engine is more than enough for 95% of driving situations. Highway driving should be ok so long as you don't expect to be cruising down the fast lane at 95!
Posted by: Mart | Apr 4, 2008 1:21:10 PM
Clean and simple interior / dash... the way cars should be made. Hope the next gen that comes to the U.S. doesn't change much.
Posted by: ziggy | Apr 4, 2008 2:05:46 PM
I dig this...
I'd buy this in a heartbeat!
The 1.4 liter is NOT a problem for yours truly.
NO way!
I just hope it drinks regular instead of premium.
NISSAN: Bring it on!
Can't wait!
Peace!<-AladdinSane--
Posted by: AladdinSane | Apr 4, 2008 2:41:12 PM
The Cube definitely gets my thumbs-up: it's practical, inexpensive, and economical. While I do like interior simplicity, this looks at least 10 years old, so the design and materials need updating, IMO (which I'm sure will happen with the redesign).
As long as it has stability control, I'll likely be considering this Nissan for my next car purchase.
Posted by: Mike B. | Apr 4, 2008 3:19:55 PM
will drive it only if fully-loaed and for free.
Posted by: Juan Carlos | Apr 4, 2008 5:04:47 PM
Great video and article Joe! After years of rumors and articles stating that the Cube is coming to the U.S., I can't believe that it's finally going to happen! I just hope that Nissan doesn't dull the Cube down for us here in N.A.
Posted by: Nissan Cube Life | Apr 4, 2008 8:13:13 PM
I'm with Juan Carlos on this. Cars like the Cube, Smart for-2, and the xA are, in my opinion, best suited for country roads and the city (small city). Since i do not frequent either of the above, i would have to pass on this one; unless, of-course, i received it as a prize or a gift.
I currently own a 1994 Tercel which i love a lot, but i find that it is only quick and responsive when the drive rides alone. Once loaded with 1 more adult and luggage (1 piece) the car bogs down considerably and getting on the highway is scary.
Andy
Posted by: Andy | Apr 5, 2008 1:07:21 AM
Please bring this out as close as you can to what the xB was. I own the 1st gen xB and just love it. 2nd gen lost the specialness. I have had 4 good size people in the car many times and there is plenty of room. Bring on the Cube, can't wait!
Posted by: Scott | Apr 5, 2008 5:32:27 AM
Alright already, Andy...
You've made your point...
Posted by: AladdinSane | Apr 5, 2008 11:45:59 AM
Alright Andy, we got it the first time. So the second to the eighth time of your comment is not really necessary.
I guess you don't park around any school with people don't know how to park.
Posted by: J | Apr 5, 2008 3:53:58 PM
Now that I remember.
Someone on ask.cars.com was asking for an AWD car with column shifter and front bench seat.
This one will do it!!
Posted by: J | Apr 5, 2008 3:58:22 PM
If only the Cube3 is coming too...can someone from Cars.com ask Nissan? It seats 6 people just a tad longer than ther Cube, and it's 1 of the most popular vehicles of choice in Japan for small families.
http://www2.nissan.co.jp/CUBE/Z11/0612/STYLE/main3.html
http://www2.nissan.co.jp/CUBE/Z11/0612/GRADE/main4.html
(キューブ = Cube; キューブ キュービック = Cube3)
Posted by: Amuro Ray | Apr 5, 2008 11:06:45 PM
I think this will be tremendously popular given the general dissatisfaction with the 2nd gen xB ... As long as they keep the same design!
Posted by: ziggy | Apr 7, 2008 2:31:17 PM