New Fuel Efficiency Standards Proposed, What Happens Next
In 2007, the fleet fuel economy average for cars was 31.0 mpg, while trucks came in behind the regulated level at 22.9 mpg.
Automakers are saying to reach these new goals they need to spend a lot of money on technology, a cost that will be passed on to the consumers. We thought there was another way to reach the goals.
Sell fewer inefficient vehicles.
Not only is the solution simple, it’s playing itself out in the current marketplace. That’s what everyone wants, right? Fewer trucks on the road, more Smart cars in the driveway?
The only problem is that with the way the government figures the Corporate Average Fuel Economy numbers even if a company sold 30% fewer trucks, their CAFE number would stay exactly the same.
So automakers really will need to technically enhance each car and truck to meet the new standards. Will car buyers need to pay more for that technology?
Not really. What we see happening is more conversion of truck-based SUVs to unibody crossovers, such as the rumored plan for Ford’s next generation Explorer. Large, truck-based SUVs may be forced to switch to diesel engines, something that light-duty pickups could also do.
Cars would be less affected since they’re already closer to the 2015 number than trucks are. Still, expect to see cylinder-deactivation become more common, as well as more turbo-charged six-cylinder engines instead of thirstier V-8s. This is already happening in Honda’s lineup and future Fords, respectively, with no inkling that either company is looking to bump those MSRPs.
Add new hybrids into the mix, and whatever alternative technology that happens between today and 2015, and there shouldn’t be a real problem for cars to advance in much the same way they already have been without costing consumers. It’s the trucks that will face the real challenge.



Trucks will face the challenge, but Americans will (finally) end their suburban love-affair with heavy, fuel-thirsty behemoths. They aren't expected to all drive Aveos, but regular 5-seat crossovers, wagons and sedans meet everyday needs. Suburban moms need to realize they don't need an Expedition to go get groceries!
Posted by: LM | Apr 23, 2008 10:15:51 AM
...or that you don't need a minivan or SUV the moment you pop out your first kid...
Posted by: Mart | Apr 23, 2008 11:33:58 AM
The vast majority of people only need a car no bigger than the Corolla, Focus, etc. The trunks on cars of this size usually provide ample space for most people, and the fold down rear seat increases storage when necessary.
Just look at cars driving down the street. Most often there's just a driver. Maybe there's a passenger. Rarely do you see more than 2 people in the car.
Most people "need" an SUV like a hole in the head. Buyers have rationalized themselves into these things. They've replaced the wagon of old - at far increased cost and lousy mileage. The original minivans grew into behemoths. If you look at the early Caravan, it wasn't very big. It grew and its bigger cousin, the "grand caravan" took the sales lead - all requiring a bigger engine to move the thing.
I was a young adult during the 2 gas crises of the 1970s. I saw what they did for small car sales (an explosion of sales), especially the second shortage. That is what propelled Toyota and Datsun (Nissan now) sales. People bought them for mileage and found they were reliable cars. VW suffered in this because people bought Rabbits and found them anything but reliable.
Perhaps the current gas prices will force consumers to be a little more rational in their choice of cars, like the 70s.
Posted by: george | Apr 23, 2008 12:53:49 PM
http://chinadaily.com.cn/china/2008-04/08/content_6599920.htm
That's it. I am selling my minivan today and getting Accord.
Posted by: Tony | Apr 23, 2008 1:49:10 PM