'Crash Tax' Adds Insult to Injury

Carcrash270

Municipalities across the country have come up with a new way to fund emergency first-responders. Some call it the crash tax, and the idea is simply this: If you get in an accident, you will pay a fee, usually through your insurance agency.

How much you have to pay depends on what kind of accident you’re in. According to Autopia, the system is tier-based, so minor scrape-ups may cost you a few hundred bucks, while larger accidents involving emergency response units may run thousands of dollars.

Already, websites have sprouted up howling about the injustice of such fund-generating methods. AccidentResponseFees.org and AccidentTax.com point out the objections of both the insurance companies, who have to cover the fees, and consumers, whose policies all increase as a result.

According to AccidentTax, 18 local or county governments have instituted such fees, although the town of Wyoming, Mich., repealed the law after it faced a vigorous backlash. The latest municipality to try to fund short budgets with the crash tax is Orange County, Fla., where the law has run into some strident objections.

Even for towns faced with unappetizing budget shortfalls, the crash tax has more questions associated with it than does the SAT. For instance, who gets charged in a no-fault accident involving bad road conditions? What if people stop calling for medical attention after accidents because they don’t want to pay the fee? What if a driver doesn’t have insurance? Would the county assess the fee to the individual?

Most importantly, what’s next? Will this lead to people having to pay the fire department to come put out their house?

Drive Carefully: Cash-Strapped Municipalities Institute “Crash Fees” to Supplement Revenue (Autopia)

By Stephen Markley | March 3, 2008 | Comments (6)
Tags: Safety

Comments 

LM

There's nothing wrong with this. You break it, you fix it.

I just hope municipalities will take greater responsibility for potholes that damage my car too.

J

LM,

It works only in the perfect world.
The place where I live, I have to drive like I am in a minefield. (The potholes are just everywhere and pretty hard to avoid them all)

Also, what would have happened if it is a hit-and-run?

Adrian

This has to be one of the most stupid and greedy things I've ever heard of. If you pay taxes in one way or another, you're already paying for emergency services. If the morons in local goverments had any brains at all, they would come up with better ways to increase revenue like attracting businesses or, God forbid, making a better budget.

Adrian,
I am with you.
Exactly - morons in local governments.
Morons - is too light of a word.

I don't think this is fair, especially if it undetermined who is at fault. It's already devistating enough when you're in a wreck and then needing to pay for it with cash just adds insult to injury.

From the national government down to the smallest municipalities, when ever they are faced with shortfalls due generally to their ineptness, they transfer the cost consequence to the honest, well-meaning overburdened citizen.

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Cars.com Search Results for