Head of NHTSA Installed Child Seats Wrong

Nicolenason

We’re not into political gossip/bashing, but we innocently found a glaring nugget buried in today’s Detroit News story on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s future proposals. Ten paragraphs into the story, the head of the agency, Nicole Nason, said she took a three-day class on how to install a child-safety seat this past July. Her conclusion? That she had been installing her own children’s seats wrong — we’re assuming since day one. She said she had never used a certain latch, though the story doesn’t detail if it was an official Latch connector or not, which is one of the essential items you need to install a seat.

Why is this such a big deal? Because for 16 months, Nason has headed the agency that regulates child-safety seats and was ignorant of their proper use.

We’ll use this time to also point to Cars.com’s guide on child-safety seats, or you can refer to NHTSA’s own site.

NHTSA Pledges Some Safety Actions by Year-End
(The Detroit News)

By David Thomas | September 20, 2007 | Comments (9)
Tags: Safety

Comments 

LM

It's pretty sad that you'd need a 3-day course to learn how to install child safety seats. Especially for a supposedly well-educated person such as the head of NHTSA. Imagine how lesser-educated folks install their safety seats.

J

What's so surprise, when we see Bush was a military drop out and still sending troops to Iraq?

Wow David!
Nice blog.
{That comes from an old car guy. I was with Nissan for years}
Joel Libava

The other Dan

If it's confusing....it's designed poorly.
Remember, the masses are asses. Make it idiot proof. And yes, I hate car seat installation. Good thing the kids are grown and gone. And now I just throw the grandkids in the back bed of the truck =)

Infosaur

The other Dan:

Problem with idiot proofing things, they keep comming out with better model idiots.

(They've got one hell of an R&D budget!)

Bah, kids! Just lash them to the hood with nylon line, like a 8 point buck! (just/kidding)

When I was little I would sit on my mom's lap, or stand on the back seat, or even sleep on the rear window ledge. We didn't have seatbelts for years. I survived ok. Sometimes I think we're too paranoid and overprotective. I did, however, ALWAYS make sure my kids were properly buckled in, and they always wear seatbelts on their own now.

anon

Thanks for providing this ridiculous and boring piece of information!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Arnold [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 10:41 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Open Letter to NHTSA Administrator Nicole R. Nason ("That's My Money You Are Misusing, Ms. Nason.")

Nicole R. Nason
Administrator
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NHTSA Headquarters
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
West Building
Washington, DC 20590
Telephone: 1-888-327-4236
Email: Submitted via [email protected] et al


Ms. Nason:

CBS News has quoted you as saying that, in your role as NHTSA Administrator, "I love knowing that at the end of the day, what we are try[ing] to do--what I am trying to do--is make a vehicle safer for my children..."

http://tinyurl.com/2csv5g

...and one need only glance at the "Quick Clicks" section of the new "NHTSA.dot.gov" web pages for evidence of your pursuit of that personal agenda.

If your mission in life is to make automobiles "safer for your children", Ms. Nason, that is admirable. But if that has skewed your focus as to what you are supposed to be doing as the administrator of a 750-employee federal bureacracy spending millions of taxpayer dollars annually, that is unacceptable. Here is what your commitment SHOULD be:

"NHTSA is committed to providing the most accurate and complete information available to its customers, the American traveling public, in a helpful and courteous fashion."

http://tinyurl.com/25bumo

YOU ARE NOT HONORING THAT COMMITMENT, MS. NASON. Since you assumed the position of NHTSA Administrator in May 2006, you have effectively closed off all agency communications with the public or press except through you. As Christopher Jensen of the New York Times reported in "What's Off the Record at N.H.T.S.A.? Almost Everything":

"The agency's new policy effectively means that some of the world's top safety researchers are no longer allowed to talk to reporters or to be freely quoted about automotive safety issues that affect pretty much everybody.... 'My God,' said Joan Claybrook, who was N.H.T.S.A. administrator from 1977 to 1981 and is now president of Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group. Given that N.H.T.S.A. is the leading source of automotive safety information in the United States, its researchers are public officials and people are entitled to 'know what information they have, whether it is on paper or in their heads,' Ms. Claybrook said."

http://tinyurl.com/2xysdz

Given your attempt to avoid public scrutiny by restricting agency-to-media communications, access to information through your NHTSA website becomes all the more crucial. And what has happened there since you took over? A major "upgrade" ... one unnecessary casualty of which was many resource references which are now "broken links" like this one:

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/ncsa/tsf2005/motorcyclestsf05.pdf

SO MUCH FOR "HELPFUL AND COURTEOUS", MS. NASON. Let's now take a look at how you're doing in the "accurate and complete information" department, specifically with respect to this recent report:

DOT HS 810 834 September 2007
Fatal Two-Vehicle Motorcycle Crashes
http://tinyurl.com/273y2f

The stated purpose of this report is to "...analyze fatal two-vehicle motorcycle crashes for trends and crash characteristics using FARS (Fatality Analysis Reporting System) data [and to] identify possible factors relating to the drivers/operators in these crashes [so as to] understand possible causes for these crashes." And what were the findings?

Many of your "findings" in this report are obvious to anyone with a basic knowledge of motorcycling and a little common sense. Of course, "the role of the motorcycle was recorded as the striking vehicle" in most cases! That is what happens when a negligent, care-less, distracted or cellphone conversation-impaired motorist turns left or pulls out in front of a motorcyclist! And of course, "more than 90 percent of the two-vehicle motorcycle crashes involving passenger vehicles occurred on non-interstate roadways"! Roads without median barriers make it easier for irresponsible drivers to violate a motorcyclist's right-of-way!

What wasn't so obvious was the implication of this conclusion on page 7:

"For the passenger vehicle drivers involved in [fatal] two-vehicle motorcycle crashes, 35 percent of the driver-related factor was failure to yield right-of-way compared to only 4 percent for motorcycle operators."

Any cub reporter (wait and see) will interpret that to mean that the automobile driver was at fault in these accidents only 35 percent of the time, which would conversely mean that "it was the biker's fault" 65 percent of the time. Is that what this conclusion was intended to convey, Ms. Nason? Well, you and I know that is neither accurate nor complete information, is it?

The truth can be found, well obfuscated, in Table 22 on page 30. The obfuscation begins with your selection of a data presentation format in which the "...sums of the numbers and percents are greater than the total drivers as each driver may be coded with more than one factor." The obfuscation is perfected by using a doubletalk category breakdown in which driver offenses like making improper turns, failure to keep in proper lane, failure to obey traffic signs or signals, and even driving on the wrong side of road are reported separately and thereby partially or entirely EXCLUDED FROM THE 35 PERCENT RIGHT-OF-WAY VIOLATION STATISTIC. The truth can be found, Ms. Nason, by applying this formula:

1 - ((711 + 26) / 1792) = 0.588727679

Logic precludes any double counting in the "None reported" or "Unknown" categories, and for all other categories, the automobile driver either caused or contributed to the death of the motorcyclist. So the truth is, Ms. Nason, that AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR EITHER CAUSING OR CONTRIBUTING TO THE DEATHS OF AT LEAST 58.87% OF ALL BIKERS KILLED IN TW0-VEHICLE CRASHES IN 2005.

THAT is "accurate and complete information", Ms. Nason. So why isn't THAT statistic included in your report? And how much other "accurate and complete information" that conflicts with your misguided, Haddonistic view of the world...

http://tinyurl.com/2ttq9v

...are you spinning, obfuscating or just outright excluding from all the other "traffic safety information" reports you are fabricating at the taxpayers' expense?

That's MY money you are misusing, Ms. Nason.

Speaking strictly for myself and no other entities or organizations,

Bruce Arnold

[email protected]
Author and Publisher, LdrLongDistanceRider.com
Co-Moderator, Bruce-n-Ray's Biker Forum
Premier Member, Iron Butt Association
Sustaining Member, Motorcycle Riders Foundation
2007 Chairman's Circle, American Motorcyclist Association

Sam

In view of the above comment from Bruce Arnold, as well as the subject of this blog, Ms. Nason is not qualified to head up NHTSA. The "hidden" agenda of this agency, as well as other government agencies must stop. Please write to your legislators and representatives and ask why your taxpayer's money is being spent supporting this type of farce. We, the people, have a right to know what our "public servants" are doing. We have the right to have a competent person in this position. Ms. Nason's resume is in law, not automobiles or roads and highways. My God! She can't even put a child seat into a car correctly! I'm not a lawyer, nor was I an engineer (yet), and I figured it out. This is outrage in the fullest. It's not a thing to joke over. Please take this seriously and exercise your rights by complaining.

Post a Comment 

Please remember a few rules before posting comments:

  • If you don't want people to see your email address, simply type in the URL of your favorite website or leave the field empty.
  • Do not mention specific car dealers by name. Feel free to mention your city, state and brand.
  • Try to be civil to your fellow blog readers. This blog is not a fan or enthusiast forum, it is meant to help people during the car-buying process and during the time between purchases, so shoppers can keep a pulse on the market.
  • Stay on topic. We want to hear your opinions and thoughts, but please only comment about the specified topic in the blog post.
view posting rules

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Results

KickingTires Search Results for

Search Kicking Tires

KickingTires iPhone App
Ask.cars.com